Synergistic Effect of Integrated Project Delivery, Lean Construction, and Building Information Modeling on Project Performance Measures: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Nguyen, Phuong Hoang; Akhavian, Reza

doi:10.1155/2019/1267048

Cited by 43 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moving beyond BIM and IPD, the benefits of coupling of BIM, IPD and lean-based methods is recognised by researchers like Dossick et al (2013), who supported that such integration enhances the quality of design and construction deliverables. Integrating IPD, BIM and other lean techniques such as Target Value Design (TVD) can result in noticeable improvements, in terms of project scheduling and cost reduction (Nguyen and Akhavian, 2019). Jang et al (2019), similarly, assert the importance of implementing TVD with BIM and IPD, to enable subcontractors involvement in the design process, and therefore, complete designing according to the client's budget.…”

Section: Integrating Bim Ipd and Tvd: The Benefitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revolutionising cost structure for integrated project delivery: a BIM-based solution

Elghaish

Abrishami

Hosseini

et al. 2020

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe amalgamation of integrated project delivery (IPD) and building information modelling (BIM) is highly recommended for successful project delivery. However, IPD lacks an accurate cost estimation methodology at the “front-end” of projects, when little project information is available. This study aims to tackle this issue, through presenting analytical aspects, theoretical grounds and practical steps/procedures for integrating target value design (TVD), activity-based costing (ABC) and Monte Carlo simulation into the IPD cost structure, within a BIM-enabled platform.Design/methodology/approachA critical review was conducted to study the status of cost estimation within IPD, as well as exploring methods and tools that can enhance the cost estimation process for IPD. Thereafter, a framework is developed to present the proposed methodology of cost estimation for IPD throughout its entire stages. A case project is used to validate the practicality of the developed solution through comparing the profit-at-risk percentage for each party, using both traditional cost estimation and the proposed solution.FindingsAfter applying the proposed IPD's cost estimation framework, on a real-life case project, the findings demonstrated significant deviations in the profit-at-risk value for various work packages of the project (approximately 100% of the finishing package and 22% of openings package). By providing a precise allocation of overhead costs, the solution can be used in real-life projects to change the entire IPD cost structure and ensure a fair sharing of risk–rewards among the involved parties in IPD projects.Practical implicationsUsing the proposed methodology of cost estimation for IPD can enhance the relationship among IPD's core team members; all revealed financial deficiencies will be considered (i.e. compensation structure, profit pooling), hence enhancing the IPD performance.Originality/valueThis paper presents a comprehensive solution for integrating BIM and IPD in terms of cost estimation, offering three main contributions: (1) an innovate approach to utilise five-dimensional (5D) BIM capabilities with Monte Carlo simulation, hence providing reliable cost estimating during the conceptual TVD stage; (2) mathematical models that are developed through integrating ABC into the detailed 5D BIM to determine the three IPD's cost structure limbs; and (3) a novel mechanism of managing cost saving (rewards) through distinguishing between saved resources from organisation level, to daily task level, to increase trust among parties.

show abstract

Section: Integrating Bim Ipd and Tvd: The Benefitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revolutionising cost structure for integrated project delivery: a BIM-based solution

Elghaish

Abrishami

Hosseini

et al. 2020

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…e approach has been enhanced with BIM (building information model) and lean practices and improved project performance, especially cost performance and schedule performance [74].…”

Section: Compensation Systems To Encourage Just-in-timementioning

confidence: 99%

A Dynamic Just‐in‐Time Component Delivery Framework for Off‐Site Construction

Lei

et al. 2021

Advances in Civil Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Off-site construction entails various advantages compared with the traditional construction method; however, the fragmentation of the prefabrication and assembly results in a complex supply chain. Both general contractors and factories often encounter production deviation, making the original component delivery plan nonoptimal. Traditionally, both parties tend to rely on internal resources or third-party resources to manage schedule changes, paying little attention to the optimisation of the component delivery process. The static compensation mechanisms reported in existing literature require factories to manage demand fluctuations but fail to encourage general contractors to control schedule deviations. Therefore, a dynamic compensation mechanism is proposed to achieve just-in-time component delivery, with which a factory shares possible changes for each component’s delivery date to its clients on an inverse Kanban system. First, unfavourable changes for the factory schedule are allocated with surcharges, and the general contractor should compensate the factory if it accepts the date changes; secondly, schedule changes that are beneficial for the factory are assigned as incentives, and the general contractor receives the factory’s incentive upon agreeing to the changes. Based on these two scenarios, genetic algorithm-based optimisation models are developed to achieve optimal delivery planning solutions. General contractors can obtain an optimal component delivery date to reduce the additional cost when they have changed the assembly schedule. General contractors can also optimise their component delivery schedule to trade their duration flexibility for incentives offered by factories. The models can help both parties to reduce component delivery waste when either side has the motivation to change the original component delivery schedules.

show abstract

“…e interdependent implementation of these advanced techniques as well as their concurrent applications under a well-defined systematic adoption forms potentially valuemaking leverage for the performance of construction projects [48].…”

Section: Emerging Advanced Techniques For Construction Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pathways for the Improvement of Construction Productivity: A Perspective on the Adoption of Advanced Techniques

Sabet

Chong

2020

Advances in Civil Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reinventing construction is the key to improving productivity. This reinvention refers to not only inventing advanced materials and equipment but also developing new operating systems for construction projects. Inadequate application of advanced techniques impedes the operating system. Furthermore, the capabilities of advanced techniques may not cover all the areas required to meet the expected productivity level. The implications of these advanced techniques need to be reinforced by a range of productive fundamentals that remain unclarified. Further, the pathways through which these fundamentals can be aligned with the implementation of advanced techniques remain under-researched. Hence, the objectives of this research are as follows: (1) to clarify how the selected and common advanced techniques applied in this paper influence construction productivity; (2) to determine the range of productivity fundamentals required to reinforce the implementation of the advanced techniques necessary to fulfil productivity expectations; and (3) to conceptualise the integration of these productivity fundamentals with the application of advanced techniques. A scoping review of 128 articles was used to identify which fundamentals can contribute to achieving performance targets once practising these new advanced techniques. The findings reveal a comprehensive range of productivity fundamentals that are able to reinforce new advanced techniques through different pathways of their applications.

show abstract

Synergistic Effect of Integrated Project Delivery, Lean Construction, and Building Information Modeling on Project Performance Measures: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Cited by 43 publications

References 34 publications

Revolutionising cost structure for integrated project delivery: a BIM-based solution

Revolutionising cost structure for integrated project delivery: a BIM-based solution

A Dynamic Just‐in‐Time Component Delivery Framework for Off‐Site Construction

Pathways for the Improvement of Construction Productivity: A Perspective on the Adoption of Advanced Techniques

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About