2001
DOI: 10.2307/3285259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synlophe in Ostertagia cf. kasakhstanica (Nematoda: Ostertagiinae), the Minor Morphotype of O. bisonis from Western North America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in oxyurid nematodes, Ainsworth () identified male dimorphism in two species of Skrjabinodon nematodes, with morphological differences between male morphs consistent between the two species. Male dimorphism is also quite common in Ostertagiinae nematodes (Hoberg & Abrams, ; Grillo et al ., ; Hoberg et al ., ). In one representative of this group, Teladorsagia circumcincta , the frequency of morphological polymorphism is primarily density dependent, with minor male morphs more likely to occur in high intensity infections, their intensity being positively correlated with that of the larger morph (Craig et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in oxyurid nematodes, Ainsworth () identified male dimorphism in two species of Skrjabinodon nematodes, with morphological differences between male morphs consistent between the two species. Male dimorphism is also quite common in Ostertagiinae nematodes (Hoberg & Abrams, ; Grillo et al ., ; Hoberg et al ., ). In one representative of this group, Teladorsagia circumcincta , the frequency of morphological polymorphism is primarily density dependent, with minor male morphs more likely to occur in high intensity infections, their intensity being positively correlated with that of the larger morph (Craig et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nematodes were cleared with 10 % glycerin in temporary total preparations (Ivashkin et al, 1971). Species identification were based on morphology, specifically on reproductive system peculiarities according to data of Ivashkin et al (1989), Drozdz (1995), Hoberg & Abrams (2001), Kuznetsov (2006). Due to scarcity of data on the morphology of Nematodirus spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%