2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0134-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syntax-Based Extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Osgood, 1952, pp. 54-5) Seretan (2011) ties these notions of frequency and predictability to key principles of statistics, namely: tendency and typicality. She highlights how scholars have defined a collocation as a typical, specific, and characteristic combination of words which are arbitrary, recurrent word combinations.…”
Section: Definitions Of Collocation and Methods Of Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Osgood, 1952, pp. 54-5) Seretan (2011) ties these notions of frequency and predictability to key principles of statistics, namely: tendency and typicality. She highlights how scholars have defined a collocation as a typical, specific, and characteristic combination of words which are arbitrary, recurrent word combinations.…”
Section: Definitions Of Collocation and Methods Of Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many second language studies, it has been set at one or two words to only capture adjacent pairs (e.g., Bestgen, 2017;. Seretan (2011) recognises the dangers of a span approach because it may capture syntactic noisethat is, word pairs which have no syntactic relationship. This is shown in example [1], whereby a span approach might capture 'human rights', and 'human rights organisations' as pairings but also the unrelated 'human organisations'.…”
Section: Definitions Of Collocation and Methods Of Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this goal, we added a collocation database to each of the monolingual lexical databases, using the system for collocation extraction developed by Violeta Seretan and others at LATL (cf. Seretan and Wehrli, 2009 ; Seretan, 2011 ). This system extracts candidate-collocations from a corpus, filters those candidates using standard association measures.…”
Section: Treatment Of Mwes In a Linguistically-based Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiword expressions can be defined as complex lexical units made of more than one word (see Wehrli, 2000 , 2013 ; Sag et al, 2002 ; Seretan, 2011 ; Constant et al, 2017 , among many others), where word is taken, very crudely, as a minimal string of letters between spaces (or some punctuation characters), and lexical unit corresponds to a syntactic or semantic unit. The following examples illustrate the diversity of (English) multiword expressions, and the discussion below will make those definitions clear.…”
Section: Collocations and Multiword Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter topic has been one of extreme importance for the computational linguistics community [6], and has seen many approaches aside from the information-theoretic, including with part-of-speech taggers [7] (where categories, e.g., noun, verb, etc. are used to identify word combinations) and with syntactic parsers [8] (where rules of grammar are used to identify word combinations). However, almost all of these methods have the common issue of scalability [9], making them difficult to use for the extraction of phrases of more than two words.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%