2016
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.201600396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Characterization of β‐Diketiminate Aluminum Compounds and Their Use in the Ring‐Opening Polymerization of ε‐Caprolactone

Abstract: Four aluminum alkyl compounds, [CH{(CH 3 )CN-2,4,6-MeC 198with the corresponding β-diketiminate, respectively. All compounds were characterized by 1 H NMR and 13 C NMR spectroscopy, singlecrystal X-ray structural analysis, and elemental analysis. Compounds 1-4 were found to catalyze the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of ε-caprolactone (ε-CL) with good activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Al–Me bond length in complex 2 [1.943(2) Å] is virtually identical with that observed for 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 [1.945(2) Å], but shorter than those reported for 10 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 [ 10 Fnac 2 = HC[C(CH 3 )NC 6 F 5 ] 2 , 1.957(3)/1.947(3) Å] [ 23 ] and Mesnac 2 AlMe 2 [1.960(3), 1.966(4) Å], [ 24 ] respectively. As was observed in the zinc complexes, the Al–N bond length also increases and the N–Al–N bond angles decrease with decreasing σ ‐donor capacity of the β ‐diketiminate substituent [Mesnac 2 AlMe 2 1.916(3)/1.926(3), 95.24(12)°; [ 24 ] 10 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 1.917(2)/1.926(2), 94.00(8)°; [ 23 ] 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 1.948(2)/1.942(2), 93.02(7)°; [ 19a ] and 17 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 (1.949(2)/1.956(2), 89.80(8)°], whereas the Me–Al–Me bond angles steadily increase [Mesnac 2 AlMe 2 112.63 (15)°; 10 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 118.89(14)°; 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 120.77(7)°; 17 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 123.74(2)°]. Deviations from planarity (defined by N1, N2, C1, C3) are observed for the Al atom [0.8779(28) Å] and the γ ‐carbon atom [0.2163(33) Å] in complex 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The Al–Me bond length in complex 2 [1.943(2) Å] is virtually identical with that observed for 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 [1.945(2) Å], but shorter than those reported for 10 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 [ 10 Fnac 2 = HC[C(CH 3 )NC 6 F 5 ] 2 , 1.957(3)/1.947(3) Å] [ 23 ] and Mesnac 2 AlMe 2 [1.960(3), 1.966(4) Å], [ 24 ] respectively. As was observed in the zinc complexes, the Al–N bond length also increases and the N–Al–N bond angles decrease with decreasing σ ‐donor capacity of the β ‐diketiminate substituent [Mesnac 2 AlMe 2 1.916(3)/1.926(3), 95.24(12)°; [ 24 ] 10 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 1.917(2)/1.926(2), 94.00(8)°; [ 23 ] 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 1.948(2)/1.942(2), 93.02(7)°; [ 19a ] and 17 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 (1.949(2)/1.956(2), 89.80(8)°], whereas the Me–Al–Me bond angles steadily increase [Mesnac 2 AlMe 2 112.63 (15)°; 10 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 118.89(14)°; 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 120.77(7)°; 17 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 123.74(2)°]. Deviations from planarity (defined by N1, N2, C1, C3) are observed for the Al atom [0.8779(28) Å] and the γ ‐carbon atom [0.2163(33) Å] in complex 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The Et-substituted catalysts 2 , 4 , and 6 are catalytically more active (see TOF values) than the Me-substituted complexes 1 , 3 , and 5 , respectively, typically reaching high conversions (>95%) within roughly half of the time. Comparable findings were reported for aluminum alkyl complexes, , and the enhanced catalytic activity of the Et-substituted complexes can be addressed to the slightly higher nucleophilicity of the Et compared to the Me group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The AlÀ Et complexes could be expected to be more Brønsted basic (favouring alcoholysis) and nucleophilic (favouring LA ring-opening) than their AlÀ Me counterparts (Figure S44); previously reported AlÀ Et complexes have outperformed their Me-substituted analogues. [36][37][38] Indeed, in contrast to the AlÀ Me analogues, L1(AlEt) 3 is active in the absence of BnOH albeit with poor initiation efficiency as indicated by polymers of unexpectedly high molecular weight and relatively broad dispersity (entries 3 and 9, Table 1). In the presence of BnOH, L1(AlEt) 3 and L1(AlMe) 3 showed similar activities (Table 1, entries 1 and 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%