2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of Sn-doped hematite as visible light photocatalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the deposition of solutions of Sn 4+ precursor on the hematite electrode surface apparently did not affect the color (red), and only a slight enhancement in the transmittance rate was observed (Figure S2b in the Supporting Information). However, a previous study reported that the addition of Sn 4+ as a dopant enhanced the optical absorption coefficient twofold; this was attributed to structural distortion in the hematite lattice ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the deposition of solutions of Sn 4+ precursor on the hematite electrode surface apparently did not affect the color (red), and only a slight enhancement in the transmittance rate was observed (Figure S2b in the Supporting Information). However, a previous study reported that the addition of Sn 4+ as a dopant enhanced the optical absorption coefficient twofold; this was attributed to structural distortion in the hematite lattice ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Ling and Li published a detailed review and found that a substantial improvement in the PEC performance of hematite was primarily promoted by the incorporation of Sn 4+ . However, a complete understanding of the spatial distribution of the Sn 4+ dopant, shifting of the onset potential, and changes caused in the surface state and in the kinetics of charge transfer at the semiconductor–liquid interface in the hematite nanostructure is still unclear and requires further investigation …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subtle reduction from 18 nm down to 14 nm between a-Fe 2 O 3 and the 8% dopant content was found. 33 Then, we tested the OER activity by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) in 0.1 M KOH solution (pH 13) (see Fig. 2a and S2 †).…”
Section: Preparation and Electrocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different synthesis methods for various nanostructured α-Fe 2 O 3 , such as combustion [18,19], hydrothermal process [20][21][22], sol-gel [23,24], precipitation [25][26][27], and thermal oxidation, [28][29][30] have already been explored for various applications. Several studies have investigated the utilization of nanostructured α-Fe 2 O 3 for both adsorptive removal and photocatalytic degradation of pollutants [22,23,28,[31][32][33]. As a photocatalyst, however, α-Fe 2 O 3 has several drawbacks including very fast photoexcited state lifetime due to its rapid recombination rate (10 −12 s) [31] and short diffusion length (< 10 nm) [32,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%