“…Recent investigations have also evidenced that the properties of CePO 4 nanoarchitectures depend strongly on its dimensionality, morphology, size, shape and size uniformity and crystallinity (structure- and morphology-properties relationships), and these aspects are very sensitive to the employed synthesis methodology [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,12,13,41,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. In this respect, although, 1D RPO 4 nanomaterials like CePO 4 may be prepared by relatively facile or simple solution methods [4,52,54], the controlled synthesis of these nanomaterials often requires the employment of non-conventional routes such as sol-gel [24,34], hydrothermal [3,5,7,38,39,41,43,48,49,57,58,59], microemulsion [45,60], sonochemical [18,51,61,62], or microwaves-assisted methods (combined or not with hydrothermal or solvothermal treatments) [9,22,42,56]. In these methods, the addition of chelating or complexing additives and surfactants is often necessary [1,5,7,30,45,55,63], and a rigorous and judicious control of synthesis conditions is generally needed to obtain the desired morphology, including preparation variables such as the chosen Ce and phosphate sources, the P/Ce ratio, reaction temperature and time, pH and ageing conditions, the order and speed of precursors addition (rapid vs. dropwise or continuous-flow) [4,…”