1999
DOI: 10.1039/a903558c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and magnetostructural characterization of two ferromagnetic nickel(II) dimers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
32
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the best fit possible, J (= J ab )=+33.0 cm −1 , g= 2.19, and spin impurities, ρ =0.005. The coupling constant J ab through the bridging nitrogen atoms was expected to be ferromagnetic, which is consistent with the value reported for [Ni 2 ( μ ‐N 3 ) 2 (232‐N 4 ) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 (Ni⋅⋅⋅Ni 3.423 Å, Ni−N 2.167 Å, Ni‐N‐Ni, 103.8°, J =+33.8 cm −1 ); this value is greater than those of [{Ni(terpy)(N 3 ) 2 } 2 ]⋅H 2 O (Ni‐N‐Ni: 101.6° and J =+22.8 cm −1 ) and [Ni 2 (terpy) 2 (N 3 ) 3 (H 2 O)]ClO 4 ⋅H 2 O (Ni‐N‐Ni: 102.5° and J =+13.6 cm −1 ) (terpy=2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine) . In 2 , the bridging angle of Ni1‐N4‐Ni1(− x +1, − y +1, − z +1) was 98.78(14)°.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the best fit possible, J (= J ab )=+33.0 cm −1 , g= 2.19, and spin impurities, ρ =0.005. The coupling constant J ab through the bridging nitrogen atoms was expected to be ferromagnetic, which is consistent with the value reported for [Ni 2 ( μ ‐N 3 ) 2 (232‐N 4 ) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 (Ni⋅⋅⋅Ni 3.423 Å, Ni−N 2.167 Å, Ni‐N‐Ni, 103.8°, J =+33.8 cm −1 ); this value is greater than those of [{Ni(terpy)(N 3 ) 2 } 2 ]⋅H 2 O (Ni‐N‐Ni: 101.6° and J =+22.8 cm −1 ) and [Ni 2 (terpy) 2 (N 3 ) 3 (H 2 O)]ClO 4 ⋅H 2 O (Ni‐N‐Ni: 102.5° and J =+13.6 cm −1 ) (terpy=2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine) . In 2 , the bridging angle of Ni1‐N4‐Ni1(− x +1, − y +1, − z +1) was 98.78(14)°.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This result can be expected as ferromagnetic coupling is attributed to the end‐on bridging mode of azide ion, attributed to spin polarization . Complex 2 exhibited more efficient exchange pathways as compared with those of other nickel(II) dinuclear complexes . Hence, 2 exhibits a comparatively strong ferromagnetic coupling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this study, the combination of complexes coordinated by the tridentate dmpp ligand with a pseudohalide ion has been conceived. Many dinuclear complexes of similar structure can be found in literature [16][17][18]. In this study two different m-bridges were seen to form using Cd(II) ions and two different pseudohalide ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The area of molecular magnetism has stimulated for many years great efforts from the synthetic arena of coordination chemistry with the goal of preparing materials with the desired magnetic properties [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In this respect, the judicious choice of achieving a ferromagnetic interaction between the nearest neighbor ions of a polymetallic system [10,11] has been a successful approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%