1983
DOI: 10.1039/dt9830001479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and X-ray crystal structure of a tri-iridium cluster, [Ir3(CO)6(Ph)(µ3-PPh)(µ-dppm)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…h i b i t e d .The Ir(1)ÀC distances to the σ-phenyl ligands are Ir(2)À C(33) = 2.127(11) Å and Ir(3)ÀC(39) = 2.130(10) Å. These distances are similar to the IrÀC distances to the phenyl ligands in the Ir 3 , Ir 4 , and Ir 8 complexes Ir 3 (CO) 9 (Ph)-(μ 3 -PPh)(μ-dppm) (2.084(16) Å),27 Ir 4 (CO) 8 (η 1 -Ph)[μ 4 -η 3 -PhPC(H)CPh]((μ-PPh 2 ) (2.09(1) Å),28 and Ir 8 (CO) 16 (η 1 -Ph)-(μ-PPh 2 )(μ 4 -PPh) (2.06(4) Å) 29. An ORTEP diagram of the molecular structure of 4 is shown in Figure2.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…h i b i t e d .The Ir(1)ÀC distances to the σ-phenyl ligands are Ir(2)À C(33) = 2.127(11) Å and Ir(3)ÀC(39) = 2.130(10) Å. These distances are similar to the IrÀC distances to the phenyl ligands in the Ir 3 , Ir 4 , and Ir 8 complexes Ir 3 (CO) 9 (Ph)-(μ 3 -PPh)(μ-dppm) (2.084(16) Å),27 Ir 4 (CO) 8 (η 1 -Ph)[μ 4 -η 3 -PhPC(H)CPh]((μ-PPh 2 ) (2.09(1) Å),28 and Ir 8 (CO) 16 (η 1 -Ph)-(μ-PPh 2 )(μ 4 -PPh) (2.06(4) Å) 29. An ORTEP diagram of the molecular structure of 4 is shown in Figure2.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…mentioned above 6a are the first examples of symmetrical bridging phenyl groups across Ru−Ru bonds. Other platinum group clusters with η 1 -phenyl groups are also known . As for a σ,π-interaction of a vinyl ligand, the ampy bridged cluster of Cabeza has been shown to add diphenylacetylene in such a way that the resulting alkenyl ligand employs a σ,π -interaction in bridging a Ru−Ru bond, similar to the situation for 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The arrangement of Ir(2)−P(3) = 2.285(4) Å and Ir(4)−P(3) = 2.303(4) Å, so either the gold atoms changed sites, which is likely given the known fluxionality of these atoms, or the phosphorus atom changed sites, which seems less likely since tertiary phosphines 11 Ph], 10 2.125(13) Å; [ E t 4 N ] [ I r 4 ( C O ) 1 1 ( P P h 2 C 6 H 4 ) ] , 1 0 2 . 0 9 6 ( 1 2 ) Å ; Ir 5 (CO) 11 (PPh 3 )(PPh 2 C 6 H 4 ), 10 2.14(2) Å; Ir 3 (CO) 9 (Ph)(μ 3 -PPh)(μ-dppm), 2.084(16) Å, 26 and Ir 4 (CO) 8 (η 1 -Ph)[μ 4 -η 3 -PhPC(H)CPh](μ-PPh 2 ), 2.09(1) Å. 27 There are no hydride ligands in 5, so it is assumed that the hydrogen atom that was cleaved from the phenyl ring in the ortho-metalation process was combined with the phenyl group that was also cleaved from the phosphorus atom, and the two were subsequently eliminated from the complex in the form of benzene.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%