Three-dimensional (3D) printing enhances the production of on-demand fabrication of patient-specific devices 27 as well as anatomically fitting implants with high complexity in a cost-effective manner. Additive systems that 28 employ vat photopolymerisation such as stereolithography (SLA) and digital light projection (DLP) are used 29 widely in the field of biomedical science and engineering. However, additive manufacturing methods can be 30 limited by the types of materials that can be used. In this study, we present an isosorbide-based formulation for a 31 polymer resin yielding a range of elastic moduli between 1.7-3 GN/mm 2 dependent on the photoinitiator system 32 used as well as the amount of calcium phosphate filler added. The monomer was prepared and enhanced for 3D-33 printing using an SLA technique that delivered stable and optimized 3D-printed models. The resin discussed could 34 potentially be used following major surgery for the correction of congenital defects, the removal of oral tumours 35 and the reconstruction of the head and neck region. The surgeon is usually limited with devices available to restore 36 both function and appearance and with the ever-increasing demand for low-priced and efficient facial implants, 37 there is an urgent need to advance new manufacturing approaches and implants with a higher osseointegration 38 performance. 39 40 42 and skin, as well as essential supporting structures such as blood vessels and nerves [1]. There are approximately 43 60,000 craniofacial reconstruction surgeries carried out each year in the UK alone [2]. These operations are needed 44 as a result of trauma, such as road traffic accidents, surgery to remove tumours or to correct congenital anomalies 45 in babies and children born with conditions such as cleft lip and palate. In some cases, the reconstructive surgery 46 is needed to correct functional issues, such as creating more space inside the skull to enable a person's brain to 47 grow or even to provide better protection for their eyes. Oral and maxillofacial surgery specialises in treating 48 many conditions and diseases in the head, neck, face and jaw region [3]. With the ever-growing demand for a 49 suitable material to restore both function and appearance for patients there have been developments taking place 50 in the field of dental materials to best suit the ideal selection criteria to satisfy the functionality, biocompatibility, 51 aesthetics, durability and ease of manipulation and contourability as a maxillofacial material. Due to excellent 52 osseointegration and osteogenesis properties, autologous bone grafts remain a gold standard technique for surgery 53 in this area [4]. However, the use of autologous bone grafts has disadvantages such as the risk of infection, risk 54 of rejection and multiple operations, which lead to postoperative pain and discomfort for patients. 55