2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2011.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, characterization and densification of WCu nanocomposite powders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding energies at 335.7 and 341.0 eV correspond to the 3d 5/2 and 3d 3/2 levels of Pd 2+ in the form of PdO on the surface of the Pd/W 18 O 49 hybrids. , In Figure D, the W 4f doublet with the binding energies of 35.38 and 37.58 eV could be assigned to W 6+ species, , while the W 4f doublet with binding energies of 34.88 and 37.16 eV corresponds to W 5+ . Note that no elemental tungsten was observed in the present 2D W 18 O 49 nanosheet support. , The O 1s patterns are displayed in Figure S5, Supporting Information, to further investigate the chemical states of oxygen in W 18 O 49 and Pd/W 18 O 49 . The peak with binding energy at 530.2 eV corresponds to O 1s levels of oxygen atoms O 2– in the lattice of W 18 O 49 , and the binding energy at 533.2 eV could be assigned to the adsorbed water molecules on the free oxide surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The binding energies at 335.7 and 341.0 eV correspond to the 3d 5/2 and 3d 3/2 levels of Pd 2+ in the form of PdO on the surface of the Pd/W 18 O 49 hybrids. , In Figure D, the W 4f doublet with the binding energies of 35.38 and 37.58 eV could be assigned to W 6+ species, , while the W 4f doublet with binding energies of 34.88 and 37.16 eV corresponds to W 5+ . Note that no elemental tungsten was observed in the present 2D W 18 O 49 nanosheet support. , The O 1s patterns are displayed in Figure S5, Supporting Information, to further investigate the chemical states of oxygen in W 18 O 49 and Pd/W 18 O 49 . The peak with binding energy at 530.2 eV corresponds to O 1s levels of oxygen atoms O 2– in the lattice of W 18 O 49 , and the binding energy at 533.2 eV could be assigned to the adsorbed water molecules on the free oxide surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Note that no elemental tungsten was observed in the present 2D W 18 O 49 nanosheet support. 46,47 The O 1s patterns are displayed in Figure S5 To elucidate the experimental conditions and the mechanism of the formation of Pd/W 18 O 49 hybrids, control experiments were performed. In the absence of W(CO) 6 , only aggregates of Pd nanoparticles with irregular shapes were obtained under otherwise the same experimental conditions, as demonstrated in Figure S6A, Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an average value of x = 0.15 ± 0.05, Eq. [29] leads to Z ffi 0:022 Á T (where T is substituted in K, and Z is obtained in kJ/mol). Expressing T from this equation and substituting it into Eq.…”
Section: On a Stability Criterion And Stability Diagrams To Selmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] That is why the purpose of this paper is to develop a model for thermodynamic stability of such NG alloys. Although there is plenty of previous literature on both the synthesis [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] and on modeling the stabilization of NG alloys ) (see also reviews [89][90][91][92][93] ), the present paper is novel as it puts this question into a wider framework of the nano-Calphad method, [94,95] i.e., into the thermodynamic framework originally developed by Gibbs. [96] All previous models on GB stability apply the simplest Langmuir-McLean model [97,98] (see also Reference 99) for modeling grain boundary (GB) energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W-Cu is a two-phase, bi-continuous, metal-matrix composite consisting of a tungsten (W) matrix phase and a copper (Cu) reinforcement phase. Additionally, W and Cu have different atomic crystal structures (W and Cu being BCC and FCC, respectively), large atomic radii difference of >20%, and significantly different electro-negativities (W=2.36 and Cu=1.9), thus violating the Hume-Rothery rules [44,45] and making them virtually immiscible. An exception to immiscibility exists when W and Cu powders undergo high-energy ball milling.…”
Section: Tungsten-copper Composite (W-cu)mentioning
confidence: 99%