2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-019-02671-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of a novel compound based on chitosan and ammonium polyphosphate for flame retardancy applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the above analysis, the proposed flame‐retardant mechanism of PLLA composite is presented in Scheme 2. During thermal decomposition, APP lost NH 3 , which diluted the amount of ignitable gas in the air and absorbed some combustion heat 31 . Besides, the phosphoric acid from APP was available for phosphorylation to accelerate the formation of the char layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the above analysis, the proposed flame‐retardant mechanism of PLLA composite is presented in Scheme 2. During thermal decomposition, APP lost NH 3 , which diluted the amount of ignitable gas in the air and absorbed some combustion heat 31 . Besides, the phosphoric acid from APP was available for phosphorylation to accelerate the formation of the char layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…During thermal decomposition, APP lost NH 3 , which diluted the amount of ignitable gas in the air and absorbed some combustion heat. 31 Besides, the phosphoric acid from APP was available for phosphorylation to accelerate the formation of the char layer. In addition, the H 2 O released from the above reaction also took effect in the gas phase, which lowered heat release and prevented the burning process.…”
Section: Flame Retardancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 15 a, the binding energy (BE) at 284.1 eV and 286.8 eV for C 1s peaks was assigned to C–C or C=C groups in aliphatic and aromatic fragments, or C–O in P–O–C groups, respectively, while the signal at 533.1 eV in Figure 15 b corresponds to –O– in P–O–C [ 59 ]. The peak at 134.7 eV of the P 2p spectra in Figure 15 c and 401.2 eV of N 1s spectra in Figure 15 d correspond to the P–O–P bond and the C–N or C=N in the triazine structures, respectively [ 16 , 59 , 60 ]. Theoretically, the content of elemental C in FPLA-C33 and FPLA-C53 should be increased by 3% and 5% above that of the 30%BC-m addition, whereas the actual C values in the residue of these composites were 41.62% and 44.02%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for LF, the peaks at 1430 cm − 1 and 1032 cm − 1 were typical bands of -OH and C-O stretching, respectively (Hejna et al, 2020). The peaks at 1072 cm − 1 (P-O) and 1246 cm − 1 (P = O)were typical peaks of ammonium polyphosphate (Prabhakar et al, 2019). In the FTIR spectrum of LFPN, it can be seen not only characteristic peaks of APP at 1242 cm − 1 (P = O) and 1430 cm − 1 (N-H) (Prabhakar et al, 2019) but also the characteristic peak of LF at 1032 cm − 1 (C-O).…”
Section: Chemical Structure Analysis Of Lfpnmentioning
confidence: 93%