2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of graphene oxide and its application for the adsorption of Pb +2 from aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 E illustrates the XRD pattern of GO. Ragubanshi et al (2017) found that the diffraction peak of pure graphite was appropriately 2θ = 26.58° [ 33 ]. One can see that only one weak diffraction peak at 2θ = 10.66° was shown, which corresponded to the GO nanosheets and was attributed to the (002) plane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 E illustrates the XRD pattern of GO. Ragubanshi et al (2017) found that the diffraction peak of pure graphite was appropriately 2θ = 26.58° [ 33 ]. One can see that only one weak diffraction peak at 2θ = 10.66° was shown, which corresponded to the GO nanosheets and was attributed to the (002) plane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown below, the pseudo second-order kinetic model presented a higher R 2 for the three biochars, and the theoretical equilibrium capacity (q e the were 3.27, 3.07 and 3.14 mg/g for WBC300, WBC400, and WBC600, respectively) was close to the experimental value (q e exp were 3.28, 3.10, 2.98 mg/g for WBC300, WBC400, and WBC600, respectively), with corresponding standard deviations of 0.71%, 2.12% and 11.31%. This implies that the adsorption of Hg(II) by WBCs is not only determined by a single factor, but by a variety of mechanisms, and that the main rate determining step was controlled by chemical adsorption, involving surface adsorption and valence forces such as ion or electron exchange [55,56]. Additionally, Rao et al [57] achieved the similar result with our kinetics study.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Figure 2a shows the FT-IR spectra of NCO-M, GO and mGO. The presence of characteristic peaks of GO, such as the hydroxyl (3000-3700 cm −1 ), carbonyl (1730 cm −1 ), epoxy (1217 cm −1 ) and alkoxy (1056 cm −1 ) groups, confirmed that the oxidation reaction occurred [40,41]. In the mGO spectrum, all the signature peaks of NCO-M are also observed, except the characteristic peak at 2260 cm −1 , which originates from the isocyanate group in NCO-M [42], indicating that GO was successfully modified to mGO via the urethane reaction between GO and NCO-M.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Mgomentioning
confidence: 83%