2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolite encapsulated in an ultrathin protective shell of silicalite-1 for MTH conversion

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shell-Meso-ZSM-5. Following previous work [50], the as-synthesized mesoporous ZSM-5 was impregnated first with TPAOH until incipient wetness in a Teflon beaker and dried overnight at room temperature and then with TEOS until incipient wetness and dried overnight at room temperature. The beaker was placed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave with distilled water around the beaker and heated at 180 °C for 72 h. The product was washed with distilled water and calcined at 550 °C for 20 h. The final product was ion exchanged (see Ion exchange section).…”
Section: Catalyst Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shell-Meso-ZSM-5. Following previous work [50], the as-synthesized mesoporous ZSM-5 was impregnated first with TPAOH until incipient wetness in a Teflon beaker and dried overnight at room temperature and then with TEOS until incipient wetness and dried overnight at room temperature. The beaker was placed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave with distilled water around the beaker and heated at 180 °C for 72 h. The product was washed with distilled water and calcined at 550 °C for 20 h. The final product was ion exchanged (see Ion exchange section).…”
Section: Catalyst Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sorption isotherms of both the S-1 series samples and the S-2 series samples were mainly type IV and a clear hysteresis loop in a P/P 0 range of 0.4−1.0 could be observed, indicating the existence of a hierarchical pore structure. 30,31 Especially, for samples S-1-1 and S-2-1, there was a steep nitrogen uptake at high relative pressure, implying the existence of a large size pore structure. 32 The specific surface area and external surface area of S-2-1 are 369 and 80 m 2 /g, respectively, larger than those of S-1-1 (Table 1).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The position of coke could be on the internal surface of the micropores (called soft/internal coke) blocking the accessibility to the active sites or as a coating on the outer surface of the zeolite crystal (called external coke) blocking the entrance to the internal pores. 190,191 The growth of coke species inside the internal pore is limited by the size and shape of the pore. No such spatial limitation is anticipated for the external coke.…”
Section: Catalysis Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acid sites on the external surface of the zeolites deactivate more quickly than those located inside the crystals due to a lack of shape selectivity. Therefore, to improve the catalyst lifetime, Goodarzi et al 191 attempted a surface passivation technique involving the introduction of an inert porous shell of silicalite-1 with a thickness of 15 nm on the surface of a mesoporous ZSM-5 catalyst, thus replicating a core-shell structure. In comparison to the mesoporous ZSM-5 without the protective shell, the one with the protective shell had 10 times longer catalyst lifetime extending up to 70 hours of reaction as compared to 7 hours, and 12 times higher conversion capacity based on the acid sites (from 27 to 63%).…”
Section: Catalysis Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%