2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of micellar-like terpolymer nanoparticles with reductively-cleavable cross-links and evaluation of efficacy in 2D and 3D models of triple negative breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GSH is a common internal environmental stimulus in cells that rapidly destroys the stability of intracellular nanocarriers to achieve effective drug release ( Cheng et al, 2011 ) ( Figure 4A ). Several researchers have focused on developing functional carriers with reduction responsiveness based on two strategies: insertion of disulfide bonds in the polymer backbone or using reduction-sensitive cross-linking molecules ( Gulfam et al, 2017 ; Conte et al, 2018 ; Deng et al, 2018 ; Monteiro et al, 2020 ). Glutathione (GSH) levels inside and outside cancer cells are markedly different ( Lai et al, 2021 ; Liu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Non-specific Targeted Therapeutic Nanocarriers For Treatment Of Bladder Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSH is a common internal environmental stimulus in cells that rapidly destroys the stability of intracellular nanocarriers to achieve effective drug release ( Cheng et al, 2011 ) ( Figure 4A ). Several researchers have focused on developing functional carriers with reduction responsiveness based on two strategies: insertion of disulfide bonds in the polymer backbone or using reduction-sensitive cross-linking molecules ( Gulfam et al, 2017 ; Conte et al, 2018 ; Deng et al, 2018 ; Monteiro et al, 2020 ). Glutathione (GSH) levels inside and outside cancer cells are markedly different ( Lai et al, 2021 ; Liu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Non-specific Targeted Therapeutic Nanocarriers For Treatment Of Bladder Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction‐responsive polymeric carriers with disulfide bonds have been studied by many research groups. These systems have been designed mainly using two different strategies: insertion of a disulfide bond on the polymer backbone chains or the use of reduction‐sensitive crosslink molecules which can be incorporated in the core or shell of the appropriate nanocarriers (Conte et al, 2018; Z. Deng, Yuan, Xu, Liang, & Liu, 2018; Gulfam et al, 2017; Guo et al, 2018; X. Q. Li et al, 2011; Monteiro et al, 2020; C. Shi et al, 2014). In the presence of high levels of reduced GSH in tumor cells, disulfide bonds can, in principle, be easily broken down into sulfhydryl groups which results in the disassembly of carriers and consequently in the release of cargoes (Chakravarthi, Jessop, & Bulleid, 2006).…”
Section: Design Of Reduction‐responsive Polymeric Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the key finding in this article was that placement of the disulfide cross‐links in poly(caprolactone)‐co‐poly(lactide) regions of the “cores,” compared to in poly(caprolactone) only regions, enhanced the reactivity toward GSH. This demonstrated that access of GSH to the disulfide links varied, dependent on the nature of the polymer backbone carrying the disulfides, and suggests that it might be possible to tune the reduction response of delivery systems via specific placement of disulfides in bespoke regions of a polymer (Monteiro et al, 2020).…”
Section: Design Of Reduction‐responsive Polymeric Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the toxicity of P1 was further investigated by performing Annexin‐V/PI assays, which were used to discriminate between viable, apoptotic and dead cells using flow cytometry. [ 17 ] MDA‐MB‐231 cells were incubated with P1 polymersomes at 100 µg mL −1 and 500 µg mL −1 in media for 48 h. At the lower concentration (100 µg mL −1 ) P1 was less toxic as measured by the percentage of live cells (96.18% ± 0.29) compared to the number of live cells when P1 at 500 µg mL −1 was used (94.34% ± 0.65). These data indicated that, for this assay at least, P1 caused only a small reduction in cell viability as deduced from protease activity.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%