2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10847-008-9417-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, spectroscopic studies of new water-soluble Co(II) and Cu(II) macrocyclic complexes of 4,15-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2,4,6,13,15,17-hexaazatricyclodocosane: their interaction studies with calf thymus DNA and guanosine 5′ monophosphate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the solutions of these complexes did not precipitate during this time period. These results were indicative of the robust nature of the complexes [39][40][41]. Therefore, the complexes under study did not undergo hydrolysis and consequent dissociation of chlorido ligands.…”
Section: Solution Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Moreover, the solutions of these complexes did not precipitate during this time period. These results were indicative of the robust nature of the complexes [39][40][41]. Therefore, the complexes under study did not undergo hydrolysis and consequent dissociation of chlorido ligands.…”
Section: Solution Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Additionally, hypochromaticities were recorded for all the compounds with the addition of DNA in different concentrations (1.45 × 10 –4 to 1.0 × 10 –5 M). Such changes are obvious evidence of the formation of DNA adducts . It is believed that these hypochromic shifts are probably due to the covalent and noncovalent bonds, which were observed in all target compounds …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such changes are obvious evidence of the formation of DNA adducts. 37 It is believed that these hypochromic shifts are probably due to the covalent and noncovalent bonds, which were observed in all target compounds. 38 Furthermore, the values of DNA binding constants for all ILs range from 4.543 × 10 4 to 3.518 × 10 5 , signifying a good interaction with DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…All these results indicated the robust nature of the complexes. [63][64][65] Therefore, the complexes under study did not undergo hydrolysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%