2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, structures and spectroelectrochemistry of methyl-substituted bis(η5-indenyl)iron(II) complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The averages of these Fe-C bond lengths are 2.058 Å in 1 and meso-2, and 2.062 and 2.057 Å in rac-3. All these Fe-C distances are in good agreement with the respective values reported for (g 5 -4,7-dimethylindenyl)(g 5 -pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)iron(II) [21] and bis(g 5 -cyclopentadienyl)[1,1 0 -tetramethyldisiloxy-2,2 0 -bis(g 5 -indenyl)]diiron(II) [22] and also with those values found in substituted bis(g 5 -indenyl)iron(II) complexes [23]. The relatively large range of the Fe-C bond distances indicates that the g 5 -coordination towards the indenyl ligand is not perfect, but displays some extent of ene-allyl distortion and is hence better described as a g 3 + g 2 mode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The averages of these Fe-C bond lengths are 2.058 Å in 1 and meso-2, and 2.062 and 2.057 Å in rac-3. All these Fe-C distances are in good agreement with the respective values reported for (g 5 -4,7-dimethylindenyl)(g 5 -pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)iron(II) [21] and bis(g 5 -cyclopentadienyl)[1,1 0 -tetramethyldisiloxy-2,2 0 -bis(g 5 -indenyl)]diiron(II) [22] and also with those values found in substituted bis(g 5 -indenyl)iron(II) complexes [23]. The relatively large range of the Fe-C bond distances indicates that the g 5 -coordination towards the indenyl ligand is not perfect, but displays some extent of ene-allyl distortion and is hence better described as a g 3 + g 2 mode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The signals of the carbon atoms in the 13 C NMR spectra of the indenyl complexes 2 , 3 b and 3 c were assigned by analogy with bis(indenyl)irons according to numbering scheme given in Scheme . The introduction of methyl substituents into the benzene ring leads to slight upfield shift (Δδ=0.3–2.0 ppm) of signals of indenyl six‐membered ring (C4/7 and C5/6) and downfield shift (Δδ=1.7–4.0 ppm) of signals of indenyl five‐membered ring (C1/3 and C2); the signals of C2 are shifted in greatest extent (by 2.0 ppm per each three methyl groups).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28][29] The kinetic "indenyl effect" has been comprehensively scrutinized on various molybdenum compounds by 4 ] is unusually stable, while the indenyl analogue undergoes a spontaneous and very fast ringopening to [(h 5 -Ind)(h 5 -C 5 H 4 CH 2 -h 1 -CH 2 )Mo(CO)] [BF 4 ]. 36,37 Results and discussion Reactions of [{(h 5 -4,7-Me 2 C 9 H 5 )Mo(CO) 2 (m-Cl)} 2 ] (2) with py, bpy, phen and pyma Reaction of [{(h 5 -4,7-Me 2 C 9 H 5 )Mo(CO) 2 (m-Cl)} 2 ] (2) with pyridine (py) gives a monomeric compound with h 5 -bonded indenyl ligand [(h 5 -4,7-Me 2 C 9 H 5 )Mo(CO) 2 (py)Cl] (3), see Scheme 2. It will be shown that a steric congestion of the chelating ligand is critical for the stability of [(h 3 -4,7-Me 2 C 9 H 5 )Mo(CO) 2 ( N,N L)Cl] and could be used for the control of the indenyl ring slippage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 This substitution pattern usually has only negligible effect on the reactivity due to subtle steric and electronic effects of two methyl groups in the C 6ring. 36,37…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%