2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.newar.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic observations of star formation and the interstellar medium

Abstract: Synthetic observations are playing an increasingly important role across astrophysics, both for interpreting real observations and also for making meaningful predictions from models. In this review, we provide an overview of methods and tools used for generating, manipulating and analysing synthetic observations and their application to problems involving star formation and the interstellar medium. We also discuss some possible directions for future research using synthetic observations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 624 publications
(834 reference statements)
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also find that, when comparing to H I intensity power spectra of nearby galaxies, the small-scale power spectra are dominated by the PSF shape. These results demonstrate the need to produce synthetic observations when comparing power spectra of simulations and observations (Haworth et al 2018). Our results provide a benchmark for comparing observations and simulations of Local Group-like galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also find that, when comparing to H I intensity power spectra of nearby galaxies, the small-scale power spectra are dominated by the PSF shape. These results demonstrate the need to produce synthetic observations when comparing power spectra of simulations and observations (Haworth et al 2018). Our results provide a benchmark for comparing observations and simulations of Local Group-like galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Even if multiple spatial distributions yield the same power spectrum index, our results still a key benchmark for simulations that aim to reproduce Local Group-like galaxies. Several recent works aim to simulate galaxies with properties closely matching the LMC, SMC, M31, M33, or the Milky Way (Combes et al 2012;Wetzel et al 2016;Grisdale et al 2017;Dobbs et al 2018;Garrison-Kimmel et al 2019) with many producing "synthetic" observations to compare with properties found in the actual observations (e.g., Dobbs et al 2019), a key step for directly comparing simulations and observations (Haworth et al 2018). For any simulation the produces dust maps or synthetic IR observations, matching our measured power spectrum represents an important check.…”
Section: Variation In the Power Spectrum Index Between Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By post-processing such simulations to generate synthetic observations of (molecular) gas or SFR tracers (see e.g. Pawlik & Schaye 2011;da Silva et al 2012;Krumholz 2014;Haworth et al 2017), it is possible to derive the tracer lifetimes and test how the method's performance is affected by environmental variations in tracer emissivity. First efforts in this direction are currently in progress.…”
Section: Applicability and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dynamical pictures of converging gas flows, cloud-cloud collisions and cloud collapse flows, a convergence of gas flows toward some point in space is involved. There is a major difference between converging gas flows and cloud-cloud collisions on the one hand and cloud collapse on the other: in the converging gas flow and cloud-cloud collision picture the compression is produced by some external cause (e.g., supernovae or spiral arm potentials, e.g., Mac Low & Klessen 2004;Haworth et al 2018;Kobayashi et al 2018), whereas the collapsing cloud flows are dominated by the self-gravity of the cloud itself (e.g., Vázquez-Semadeni et al 2019). In reality, externally driven converging flows may produce the clouds that then further collapse under their own self-gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%