2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0752-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System identification of the mechanomyogram from single motor units during voluntary isometric contraction

Abstract: A mechanomyogram (MMG) from single motor units of the anconeus muscle in voluntary isometric contraction was recorded from seven subjects using a spike-triggered averaging technique. The MMG system, in which the input was an ideal impulse and the output was the MMG detected with an acceleration sensor, was identified as the fifth-order model by the subspace-based state-space model identification method. The transfer function of the MMG system was factorized to the second- and the first-order models. The second… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis we employed was similar to that in the authors' previous studies [5], [7]. Here, we briefly outline the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis we employed was similar to that in the authors' previous studies [5], [7]. Here, we briefly outline the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expected the model order at low recruitment level to be fifth and that at high recruitment level to be fourth because the MMG from the single motor unit was approximated with the fifth-order model [7] and the induced MMG from parallel muscle was with the fourth-order model [6]. The decrease of the model order as the recruitment level increased can be explained based on Hill's model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The spectral content may be represented by four major indicators: (i) the mean power frequency (MPF) (Merletti and Parker, 2004) that is the average value of the power spectral density (Søgaard et al, 2012;Tarata et al, 2001;Uchiyama and Hashimoto, 2011;Zuniga et al, 2010Zuniga et al, , 2011; (ii) Mc 2 , a dispersion index, which represents the variance of the power spectral density; (iii) µ3 (Madeleine et al, 2006), which uses MPF to determine the skewness (Lee et al, 2011) of the spectrum; and (iv) the kurtosis index (Lee et al, 2011) that reflects the kurtosis of the power spectral density.…”
Section: Signal Acquisition Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%