2006
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2006.878343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System-level power-performance tradeoffs for reconfigurable computing

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a configuration-aware datapartitioning approach for reconfigurable computing. We show how the reconfiguration overhead impacts the data-partitioning process. Moreover, we explore the system-level power-performance tradeoffs available when implementing streaming embedded applications on fine-grained reconfigurable architectures. For a certain group of streaming applications, we show that an efficient hardware/software partitioning algorithm is required when targeting low power. However… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ghiasi et al [13] proposed an efficient optimal algorithm to minimize the run-time reconfiguration delay in the executions of applications on a dynamically adaptable system under assumptions on several restricted implementation constraints. Noguera and Badia [2,14] introduced a two-version dynamic scheduling algorithm for reconfigurable architectures with or without a prefetching unit. Resano et al [15] proposed a way to revise a given task schedule by considering reconfiguration to minimize the latency overheads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghiasi et al [13] proposed an efficient optimal algorithm to minimize the run-time reconfiguration delay in the executions of applications on a dynamically adaptable system under assumptions on several restricted implementation constraints. Noguera and Badia [2,14] introduced a two-version dynamic scheduling algorithm for reconfigurable architectures with or without a prefetching unit. Resano et al [15] proposed a way to revise a given task schedule by considering reconfiguration to minimize the latency overheads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%