2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlamp.2017.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System-level state equality detection for the formal dynamic verification of legacy distributed applications

Abstract: The ever increasing complexity of distributed systems mandates to formally verify their design and implementation. Unfortunately, the common approaches and existing tools to formally establish the correctness of these systems remain hardly applicable to most legacy HPC applications, that are commonly written in Fortran or C/C++, using the MPI standard.This work addresses the problem of automatically detecting at system-level the equality of the application's state. This allows to automatically verify safety an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We left other HPC use cases that are not strictly related to the SMPI framework out of the scope of this paper. We refer the reader interested in the use of SimGrid for the formal verification of HPC applications to [48] or in the support of higher-level HPC runtimes for hybrid (multi-core and multi-GPUs) platforms to [49]. Simulating applications leveraging both MPI and CUDA at a larger scale than what is presented in this article is part or our ongoing work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We left other HPC use cases that are not strictly related to the SMPI framework out of the scope of this paper. We refer the reader interested in the use of SimGrid for the formal verification of HPC applications to [48] or in the support of higher-level HPC runtimes for hybrid (multi-core and multi-GPUs) platforms to [49]. Simulating applications leveraging both MPI and CUDA at a larger scale than what is presented in this article is part or our ongoing work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%