2019
DOI: 10.1115/1.4041859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System Reliability-Based Design Optimization Under Tradeoff Between Reduction of Sampling Uncertainty and Design Shift

Abstract: This paper presents a tradeoff between shifting design and controlling sampling uncertainty in system reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) using the Bayesian network. The sampling uncertainty is caused by a finite number of samples used in calculating the reliability of a component, and it propagates to the system reliability. A conservative failure probability is utilized to consider sampling uncertainty. In this paper, the sensitivity of a conservative system failure probability is derived with respe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nassar and Austin [4] addressed the importance of constructing consistent evaluation criteria to measure the importance of every performance requirement in a multi-objective formulation for trade-offs, regardless of whether it is a system-level option or a component-level one. The trade-off considered by Bae et al in [5] is the impact of design variable selection on the final optimal solutions. In their design problem formulation, the probabilities of failures of the components and the system were included as constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nassar and Austin [4] addressed the importance of constructing consistent evaluation criteria to measure the importance of every performance requirement in a multi-objective formulation for trade-offs, regardless of whether it is a system-level option or a component-level one. The trade-off considered by Bae et al in [5] is the impact of design variable selection on the final optimal solutions. In their design problem formulation, the probabilities of failures of the components and the system were included as constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system designer usually quantifies system reliability by the probability that a system works properly without failures. The reliability may be estimated either by a physics-based approach [1][2][3][4] or a statistics-based approach [5,6]. A physicsbased approach predicts the reliability using computational models derived from physics principles, and the computational models are called limit-state functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Picheny et al 6 studied the influence of sample sizes and target probability of failure on the conservative estimate. Bae et al 7,8 showed a tradeoff between making design conservative and using more samples to reduce sampling uncertainty. However, they assumed that the samples are normally distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bae et al. 7,8 showed a tradeoff between making design conservative and using more samples to reduce sampling uncertainty. However, they assumed that the samples are normally distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%