2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-009-0303-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic biases in DORIS-derived geocenter time series related to solar radiation pressure mis-modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zenith troposphere parameters were estimated at the start of passes, and only if the previous reset was not within 20 minutes (see Bock et al, 2010, for a more detailed discussion). This solution is as close as possible to the IERS Conventions 2003 (McCarthy andPetit, 2004), and it also includes the most recent improvement in DORIS data analysis, in particular in terms of solar radiation pressure modelling (Gobinddass et al, 2009a(Gobinddass et al, , 2009b as well as in terms of atmospheric drag parameterization (Gobinddass et al, 2010).…”
Section: Doris-institut Géographique National (Doris-ign)mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Zenith troposphere parameters were estimated at the start of passes, and only if the previous reset was not within 20 minutes (see Bock et al, 2010, for a more detailed discussion). This solution is as close as possible to the IERS Conventions 2003 (McCarthy andPetit, 2004), and it also includes the most recent improvement in DORIS data analysis, in particular in terms of solar radiation pressure modelling (Gobinddass et al, 2009a(Gobinddass et al, , 2009b as well as in terms of atmospheric drag parameterization (Gobinddass et al, 2010).…”
Section: Doris-institut Géographique National (Doris-ign)mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…If the estimated daily coefficients are sufficiently stable with time, they can be approximated as a constant that will be later used for recomputing all DORIS data (current and future). However, we must first check the complete time series to look for possible discontinuities (see special case of TOPEX/Poseidon on July 27th 1993, in Gobinddass et al, 2009), or other problems (periodic signals, change in slope, etc. ).…”
Section: Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study (Gobinddass et al, 2009) demonstrated that a large part of these observed systematic errors at 118 days and at 1 year periods (draconitic/draconic 1 period of TOPEX/Poseidon and SPOTs satellites) can be removed by modifying the DORIS data analysis strategy, by rescaling the solar radiation pressure (SRP) models with a constant empirical term. As this study only used old data from TOPEX/Poseidon and SPOT-2 DORIS data, the goal of this article is to extend this study to all DORIS satellites in orbit since 1993 and to check for any improvement in the DORIS geocenter estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0845-x the modelling of solar radiation pressure (SRP) effects. Mismodelling of SRP introduces spurious signals in the time series of geocentre coordinates estimated from GNSS (Meindl et al 2013) and DORIS data (Gobinddass et al 2009a), particularly along the Z axis. GNSS geocentre motion estimates are particularly vulnerable to modelling errors due to their strong collinearity with other parameters routinely estimated in standard GNSS data analyses, as demonstrated by Rebischung et al (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%