1975
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(75)90377-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic effects of charge independence breaking on energies of analog states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the np interaction in the T = l state, being 2-3% more attractive than the nn interaction (see also Kahana 1972). Very recent analyses of AE, of the analogue states in the ld312 shell (A = 33-36) by Sherr and Talmi (1975) and in the l f 7 , ~ shell ( A =41-54) by Gomez (1976) also provide systematic evidence for a CIB interaction. The values deduced in these analyses for the d3$(0) and d3p2 ( J = 2 ) matrix elements of the CIB interaction are -90 and -45 keV, respectively.…”
Section: Charge Dependence Vnp #Vnnsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This is consistent with the np interaction in the T = l state, being 2-3% more attractive than the nn interaction (see also Kahana 1972). Very recent analyses of AE, of the analogue states in the ld312 shell (A = 33-36) by Sherr and Talmi (1975) and in the l f 7 , ~ shell ( A =41-54) by Gomez (1976) also provide systematic evidence for a CIB interaction. The values deduced in these analyses for the d3$(0) and d3p2 ( J = 2 ) matrix elements of the CIB interaction are -90 and -45 keV, respectively.…”
Section: Charge Dependence Vnp #Vnnsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The present measurement is in good agreement with the prediction employing the effective USD interaction. A configuration mixing which was suspected to exist for the T = 3/2 seems to be confirmed [17]. A simple Z/A collective prediction, g coll = 0.542, doubles the experimental value, thus promoting the dominant single-particle nature in the ground state wavefunction of 35 K. The sign of g can not be determined directly from the current measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%