2022
DOI: 10.3926/ic.1806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic literature review of interpretative positions and potential sources of resistance to change in organizations

Abstract: Purpose: This article addresses the main concerns of existing literature about resistance to change (RC) in organizations, namely the limited interpretative position regarding RC focusing mainly on negative aspects and excluding potential benefits, and the poor consensus or even understanding of RC sources in organizations.Design/methodology: To approach our goal, a systematic literature review will be carried out. The initial sample, obtained using reproducible search algorithms on Scopus and Web of Science, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding corroborates Piderit (2000), given that the reaction of individuals to change may produce intensely positive emotions such as joy and happiness. Likewise, it reinforces the importance of considering the positive positions in order to facilitate a broader understanding of resistance to change, as underscored by Gonz alez et al (2022).…”
Section: Affective Questionsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding corroborates Piderit (2000), given that the reaction of individuals to change may produce intensely positive emotions such as joy and happiness. Likewise, it reinforces the importance of considering the positive positions in order to facilitate a broader understanding of resistance to change, as underscored by Gonz alez et al (2022).…”
Section: Affective Questionsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Important aspects analyzed by the authors are the benefits of the reactions (even if negative). This is also discussed by Gonz alez et al (2022) in their review, which underscores a limited interpretative position in terms of resistance to change, since studies focused primarily on the negative aspects, excluding potential benefits. The authors also reinforce the importance of considering positive and neutral positions in order to facilitate a broader understanding/approach to organizational resistance to change.…”
Section: Bpm and Resistance To Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The systematic review of the literature was carried out following the approach of González del Val and Cano (2022) based on Denyer and Tranfield (2005) and Pérez-Rave (2012). The criteria for inclusion/exclusion of documents were as follows: i) articles reviewed by experts in databases that have such a requirement to index articles, in particular, have been analyzed: Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, ABI and Emerald; ii) written in English or Spanish (following Amor et al, 2019); and iii) that the words'job crafting' appear in the title and summary of articles published in the last three years (2020)(2021)(2022).…”
Section: Searching For Information and Selecting Documentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinctive feature of the current environment is the process management of organizations -after all, change itself is a process, as Kaes and Rinderle-Ma (2017) (Maurer, 2010). As an example of another model, we can use the Kübler-Ross model, which also defines the attitude of employees to the change process in five stages, or the typical Lewin model, which also evaluates the perspective of employees in detail (González et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%