Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Haptoglobin, Serum Amyloid A, and Fibrinogen versus Clinical Reference Standards for the Diagnosis of Bovine Respiratory Disease

Abstract

BackgroundBovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a worldwide animal health concern especially in feedlot, dairy, and veal calves. One of the greatest challenges is the absence of a gold standard for achieving an accurate antemortem diagnosis. Various blood markers, including the acute‐phase proteins (AAP), have been proposed as potential valuable tools for BRD diagnosis.ObjectivesTo perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the accuracy of selected APP (haptoglobin [Hp], serum amyloid A [SAA], and fibrinogen [Fb]) as diagnostic tools for cattle with naturally occurring BRD when compared with clinical reference standards of diagnosis.MethodsThis review was performed with eligible studies selected from CAB Abstract and MEDLINE from 1946 to 2015, as well as the “gray literature.” Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS‐2 tool developed for diagnostic accuracy studies. The accuracy parameters sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were obtained from the articles or through contact with the authors when not directly reported.ResultsA total of 314 studies were identified, from them, 23 met inclusion criteria as diagnostic studies for naturally occurring BRD. Quality of studies showed high risk of bias for case selection (70% of articles) and unclear risk of bias for index test (65%), reference standard (74%), and flow and timing (61%). There were high concerns regarding applicability for case selection (61% of studies) and reference standards used for defining BRD (48%). The concerns regarding index test application were low (83% of the studies). Only 4–8 studies could be included in the meta‐analysis for each APP. No pooled estimates or pooled accuracy measurements were performed due to the low number of studies and multiple differences between studies, including reference standard definitions.Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceOn the basis of these findings, it is not possible to make conclusions regarding the accuracy of APP for BRD diagnosis. The reporting of accuracy of APP for BRD detection is inconsistent among studies. Recommendations to improve capability for future meta‐analyses in this area include reporting studies on diagnostic tests following the Standard for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD), as well as trying to standardize BRD definition across future studies.

Validation of a clinical scoring system for bovine respiratory disease complex diagnosis in preweaned dairy calves using a Bayesian framework

“…The absence of a gold standard test is a recurrent issue in BRD research (White and Renter, 2009;Abdallah et al, 2016;Timsit et al, 2016;White et al, 2016). Due to this limitation, composite reference standard definition is frequently used.…”

Effects of transportation on cattle health and production: a review

“…The investigation of acute phase proteins as markers for potential BRD has value. However, the results of a limited meta-analysis indicated that they have no diagnostic accuracy for, and are not valid indicators of, BRD (Abdallah et al ., 2016). When the prevalence of the disease is low, acute phase proteins have poor utility as a standalone diagnostic tool (Seppa-Lassila et al ., 2017).…”

Calibration of Novel Protein Biomarkers for Veterinary Clinical Pathology: A Call for International Action

“…There have been few if any similar investigations comparing assays for other novel protein biomarkers, however there has been recent studies of results from assays of bovine haptoglobin in investigation of bovine respiratory disease that illustrate the problem caused by lack of an international calibration standard. A meta analysis of papers in the literature reporting on the use of bovine haptoglobin as a biomarker of this condition (24) identified 314 studies although only 23 met inclusion criteria for the meta analysis. Of these 52% of the investigations used an ELISA method from one manufacturer with a consistent calibration standard which gave reference range in healthy cattle of 0–0.15 mg/ml 1 with a median haptoglobin concentration of 2.6 mg/ml in cattle with bovine respiratory disease (25).…”