2022
DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2032523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tariq et al reported sensitivity and specificity of SLUMS for MCI with different groupings based on level of education: for those with less than a high school education, SLUMS had 92% sensitivity and 81% specificity; for those with high school education or higher, SLUMS had a 95% sensitivity and 76% specificity ( 76 ). While these results are encouraging, Spencer et al , in a systematic review of SLUMS reported slightly lower sensitivities and specificities ( 81 ). Further, it is important to note that there are no meta-analyses published regarding studies that have evaluated SLUMS since the data is less robust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tariq et al reported sensitivity and specificity of SLUMS for MCI with different groupings based on level of education: for those with less than a high school education, SLUMS had 92% sensitivity and 81% specificity; for those with high school education or higher, SLUMS had a 95% sensitivity and 76% specificity ( 76 ). While these results are encouraging, Spencer et al , in a systematic review of SLUMS reported slightly lower sensitivities and specificities ( 81 ). Further, it is important to note that there are no meta-analyses published regarding studies that have evaluated SLUMS since the data is less robust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…‡ , data from Park et al ( 77 ). § , data from Tariq et al ( 76 ) and Spencer et al ( 81 ). MCI, mild cognitive impairment; SROC, summary receiver operated curve; N/A, not applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any patient visiting the geriatric medicine outpatient department and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were assessed. Patients with major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) were excluded using Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) score[ 9 ]. A score of 19 or less (for high school education) and a score 14 or less (for lower than high school education) was used as a cut off for MNCD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 The validity of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination, Barthel Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia, the Confusion Assessment Method, and Quality of Interaction Schedule have been established. 39,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47]50…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%