2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04624-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review of Thrombolysis Therapy in the Management of Non-Cirrhosis-Related Portal Vein Thrombosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical success was demonstrated by prevention of resection in 15 of 17 patients, with no patient developing portal hypertensive complications during follow-up (43). Significant shortand long-term benefits with thrombolysis were noted in a meta-analysis performed by Cheng et al (47). The authors demonstrated favorable clinical and radiological outcomes, with a symptom improvement rate of 86% and a partial/ complete recanalization rate of 84%.…”
Section: Catheter-directed Thrombolysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Clinical success was demonstrated by prevention of resection in 15 of 17 patients, with no patient developing portal hypertensive complications during follow-up (43). Significant shortand long-term benefits with thrombolysis were noted in a meta-analysis performed by Cheng et al (47). The authors demonstrated favorable clinical and radiological outcomes, with a symptom improvement rate of 86% and a partial/ complete recanalization rate of 84%.…”
Section: Catheter-directed Thrombolysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Local or systemic thrombolysis is usually proposed to a limited number of patients with thrombus progression or worsening clinical conditions despite adequate anticoagulation or with bowel infarction. 25 34…”
Section: Splanchnic Vein Thrombosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major complications of thrombolysis are seen in about 7%, making it a safe therapeutic option (81). Balloon venoplasty has technical success rates of 66%-78% and restenosis rate of 28%–30% in contrast to stenting (78%–100% and 0%–28%, respectively) (82,83).…”
Section: Interventions In Portal Vein Thrombosis and Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%