Systematic Review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and Depression (2): What Is Known About Depression ISGs?

Abstract

Background Internet support groups (ISGs) are a popular means by which consumers with depression communicate online. A number of studies have evaluated the nature and impact of depression-specific ISGs. However, to date there have been no published systematic reviews of this evidence.Objective The aim was to systematically identify and summarize the available evidence concerning the scope and findings of studies of depression ISGs.Methods Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane) were searched using over 150 search terms extracted from relevant papers, abstracts, and a thesaurus. Papers were included if they employed an online peer-to-peer depression-specific support group and reported either quantitative or qualitative empirical data. The objective of each study was coded according to a 20-category classification system, which included the effect on depression and other outcomes, including help seeking; user characteristics, activity, satisfaction, perceived benefits, perceived disadvantages; the reason for using the ISG; the nature of ISG posts; characteristics of depression ISGs compared to other ISG types, face-to-face groups, and face-to-face counseling; ISG structure and longitudinal changes; and predictors of ISG adherence.Results Thirteen papers satisfied the inclusion criteria from an initial pool of 12,692 abstracts. Of these, three collected data using survey questionnaires, nine analyzed samples of posts, and one both collected survey data and analyzed a sample of posts. The quality of most studies was not high, and little data were collected on most key aspects of depression ISGs. The most common objective of the studies was to analyze the nature of the posts (eight studies) and to describe site usage (six studies) and user characteristics (five studies). The most prevalent types of social support were emotional, informational, and social companionship.ConclusionsGiven the popularity of depression ISGs and the paucity of available evidence about them, there is a need for high-quality, systematic studies of these groups, their impact, and the characteristics of their members and users. Such information is required to inform decision making by consumers, provider and educational organizations, guideline developers, policy makers, and funding bodies considering using, recommending, providing, or funding such groups.

New Frontiers in Healthcare and Technology: Internet-and Web-Based Mental Options Emerge to Complement In-Person and Telepsychiatric Care Options

“…Young people with developmental challenges may have few traditional care options and feel more comfortable anonymously or at a distance, to share experiences and try to learn new behaviors [43]. Comfortable with Internet-based chats and groups, they may even express ideas of self-harm, negative affective states, or pessimistic cognitions of other peers [44,45]. This is concerning, though, if these things are not shared with parents and/or professionals.…”

Pilot study of Internet-based early intervention for combat-related mental distress

“…The motivational framework comprises the elements of engagement and guidance by a professional social worker to enhance adherence (element 2) [21] and the opportunity to interact with peers to relate learned materials to participants' current concerns (element 3) [22][23]. With regard to element 2, a master's level social worker reviewed progress and conducted brief weekly MIs with participants via instant messaging (IM) chats to sustain adherence.…”

Cognitive Theories of Depression in Online Peer Support Forums: Exploring the Cognitive Triad

“…Users of the internet for mental health problems are described as individuals with lower levels of social support (Ivanova, Lindner, & Dahlin, 2015), a median age of 40 years, more likely to be women and with high unemployment levels (Houston et al, 2002). However, a systematic review (Griffiths, Calear, Banfield, & Tam, 2009) found no definitive information on OF gender distribution, concluding that OF user ages commonly range between mid to late 20s and mid-40s. This lack of consensus highlights the need to identify the socio-economic demographics of forum users.…”