Systematic review protocol examining the influence of surgeon personality on perioperative decision making in abdominal surgery

Abstract

IntroductionThere is limited published literature exploring how the personality traits of surgeons may influence preoperative decision making, particularly in the context of visceral/abdominal surgery. Multiple validated personality scoring systems exist and have been used to describe surgeon personalities previously. The degree to which each trait is expressed by abdominal surgeons is neither currently known, nor the impact of these traits on postoperative outcomes. The protocol has been written in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols checklist.Methods and analysisThe search strategy has been developed by a Health Scientist Librarian in collaboration with the review team. The search was conducted on 1st October 2019.Database subject headings and text words relating to ‘abdominal/general surgeons’, ‘personality’, ‘postoperative outcomes’ and ‘decision making’ formed the basis of our literature search strategy; the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo and Cochrane databases will be searched. Three reviewers will independently screen and appraise articles, with a fourth reviewer utilised if disagreements arise.A systematic narrative synthesis will be performed, with information presented in text and table format. These will summarise the findings and characteristics of any included studies. Using guidance from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, the reviewers will describe the potential relationship and findings between studies using the narrative synthesis. Studies will only be reported if they are felt to have low or mid-levels of bias. Studies felt to display high levels of bias will be excluded.Ethics and disseminationThis study does not require ethical approval. The formal systematic review will be submitted for peer reviewed publication and presented at relevant conferences. The methods may inform future reviews in other surgical specialties regarding surgeon personality.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019151375.

A Systematic Review of the Abdominal Surgeon’s Personality: Exploring Common Traits in Western Populations

“…Our systematic review was first registered on PROSPERO (University of York, UK) in September 2019 (CRD42019151375), and the full protocol published in February 2020 (PMID 32019819) [ 21 ]. No deviations from the protocol occurred.…”

A comparison of personality traits, learning style, and perceived stress among surgical and nonsurgical residents in a tertiary care hospital in India

“…Surgical personality is hypothesized to affect a patient's mortality and morbidity. [ 6 ] It is believed that low scores in openness and emotional stability may influence decision making in surgery and might affect the morbidity and mortality rate of patients. [ 6 ] A study, done in Ohio, with a sample size of 192 medical staff found that surgeons scored significantly higher on conscientiousness and extraversion but lower on agreeableness compared to nonsurgeons.…”

Intra‐operative assessment of left‐sided colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review of available techniques

“…This has the potential to delay the diagnosis of a leak and its subsequent management, and to an increase in morbidity. However, research into surgical personality types and human factors has become a key focus in patient safety and assessment of Non-Operative Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) are increasingly integrated into surgical teaching programmes[68][69][70]. These include cognitive and interpersonal skills with the aim of improving situational awareness and decision making, in an attempt to reduce adverse surgical events.…”