2016
DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Reviews of Mechanisms for Financing Family Planning: Findings, Implications, and Future Agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2016; Bellows et al. 2016; Lissner and Ali 2016). For example, providing free vouchers for contraceptives did not increase contraceptive use or shift method choice among postpartum women in Kenya in a randomized controlled trial (McConnell et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2016; Bellows et al. 2016; Lissner and Ali 2016). For example, providing free vouchers for contraceptives did not increase contraceptive use or shift method choice among postpartum women in Kenya in a randomized controlled trial (McConnell et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, reducing unmet family planning needs has unequivocally saved lives and money [1,7]. The promotion of family planning in LMICs has the potential to reduce poverty and hunger and to prevent 30% of all maternal deaths and nearly 10% of childhood deaths [8]. Moreover, the additional immunisation costs decrease over time as population size decreases [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 The evidence base from LMIC on mechanisms to address user fees and improving quality of clinical care to increase uptake of GBV services, however, is limited. 36 An intervention in Kenya involved distributing vouchers offering GBV recovery care free of charge to women attending reproductive health facilities. Although a full-scale intervention evaluation was not undertaken, qualitative research identified reservations by community members on the validity of the vouchers and also on shame and stigma in accessing targeted GBV care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%