2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032131
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Validation of Protein Force Fields against Experimental Data

Abstract: Molecular dynamics simulations provide a vehicle for capturing the structures, motions, and interactions of biological macromolecules in full atomic detail. The accuracy of such simulations, however, is critically dependent on the force field—the mathematical model used to approximate the atomic-level forces acting on the simulated molecular system. Here we present a systematic and extensive evaluation of eight different protein force fields based on comparisons of experimental data with molecular dynamics sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

27
757
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 629 publications
(787 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
27
757
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards the simulation, the main concern is the quality of the empirical force field. However, the force field used in this simulation (47) has fared very well when benchmarked against NMR data related to conformational flexibility of native proteins (55)(56)(57). Moreover, the MD trajectory used here yields excellent agreement with the NMR-determined exchange times of the four internal water molecules in BPTI (58).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As regards the simulation, the main concern is the quality of the empirical force field. However, the force field used in this simulation (47) has fared very well when benchmarked against NMR data related to conformational flexibility of native proteins (55)(56)(57). Moreover, the MD trajectory used here yields excellent agreement with the NMR-determined exchange times of the four internal water molecules in BPTI (58).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This discrepancy should most likely be ascribed to deficiencies in the force field representation of the system, and may be related to the weak temperature dependence of the stability of helical structures (9). This appears to be a general characteristic of the force fields commonly used for protein simulations (19,20), suggesting that some aspects of protein folding, like helix formation, involve many-body effects that may not be fully reproduced by simple pairwise additive force fields. The importance of such effects is likely to be system-and size-dependent and, while it appears to be possible to get good quantitative agreement with experiment in folding simulations of small proteins with current force fields, folding simulations of larger proteins may require the development of improved functional forms beyond currently used functional forms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial improvements have also been made in the molecular mechanics force fields used in MD simulations (14,(18)(19)(20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64,65 We chose the AMBER99sb*-ILDN force field rather than older versions of AMBER, and the OPLS-AA or GROMOS force field, 66 because it provides a better description of the structural and dynamical properties of well-structured proteins and allows folding of diverse proteins into their NMR structures. 64 The parameters for NQTrp, obtained from quantum calculations, were taken from our previous study. 31 Aβ dimer was initially put in the center of a dodecahedron box with periodic boundary conditions.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%