2012
DOI: 10.1038/nature10972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic variation of the stellar initial mass function in early-type galaxies

Abstract: Much of our knowledge of galaxies comes from analysing the radiation emitted by their stars, which depends on the present number of each type of star in the galaxy. The present number depends on the stellar initial mass function (IMF), which describes the distribution of stellar masses when the population formed, and knowledge of it is critical to almost every aspect of galaxy evolution. More than 50 years after the first IMF determination, no consensus has emerged on whether it is universal among different ty… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

87
707
7
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 592 publications
(803 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
87
707
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Auger et al, 2010;Treu et al, 2010;Spiniello et al, 2011;Cappellari et al, 2012Cappellari et al, , 2013Brewer et al, 2012;Dutton et al, 2013;Tortora et al, 2013), though we note that increased mass to light ratios can result from both bottom-light and bottom-heavy IMFs (the former owing to increased numbers of low mass stars, which the latter originating in increased numbers of stellar remnants). Considering both the indirect evidence of potential IMF variations at high-z, as well as observations of presentepoch massive galaxies (which are likely descendants of starbursts at high-z), it is fair to say that the form of the IMF in high-z systems is still a completely open issue.…”
Section: Stellar Imfmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Auger et al, 2010;Treu et al, 2010;Spiniello et al, 2011;Cappellari et al, 2012Cappellari et al, , 2013Brewer et al, 2012;Dutton et al, 2013;Tortora et al, 2013), though we note that increased mass to light ratios can result from both bottom-light and bottom-heavy IMFs (the former owing to increased numbers of low mass stars, which the latter originating in increased numbers of stellar remnants). Considering both the indirect evidence of potential IMF variations at high-z, as well as observations of presentepoch massive galaxies (which are likely descendants of starbursts at high-z), it is fair to say that the form of the IMF in high-z systems is still a completely open issue.…”
Section: Stellar Imfmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Such behavior is also seen in massive early-type galaxies (Bernardi et al 2011). The systematic deviation might also hint at bottom heavy IMFs in more massive galaxies, again as seen in massive early type galaxies (van Dokkum & Conroy 2010;Cappellari et al 2012). The HI massive galaxies lie systematically above the BTF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This error could arise because the stellar initial mass function (IMF) is more bottom heavy in the faster rotators. Although this hypothesis may seem farfetched, there is empirical evidence for this type of behavior among early type galaxies (van Dokkum & Conroy 2010;Cappellari et al 2012), where the IMF becomes progressively more bottom heavy as one considers galaxies with larger velocity dispersions. Evidence for IMF variations even extends to Local Group clusters (Zaritsky et al , 2014a, and so the possibility that such variations exist among disk galaxies as well should not be quickly dismissed.…”
Section: The Baryonic Tully-fisher Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMF for Population-II stars is usually directly measured for nearby star clusters and locally resolved stellar populations (Bastian, Covey & Meyer 2010), and occasionally indirectly via dynamical modelling (Cappellari et al 2012 LGRBs is redshift independent changing the IMF would only change the overall normalisation (or absolute value of LGRBs). This, however, has no effect on the results outlined in this paper and any change in the overall rate of LGRBs caused by changing the IMF would be much smaller than the other model parameters involved (we discuss this in more details in Sect.…”
Section: Initial Mass Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%