2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0007485309990721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematics and molecular phylogeny of two African stem borer genera,SciomesaTams & Bowden andCarelisBowden (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Abstract: Currently, the systematics of the African noctuid stem borers of the subtribe Sesamiina, which include major pests of cereals, is confused. In addition, their ecology is poorly known, as are the factors influencing their evolution. In this paper, we address these shortcomings for two genera of the Sesamiina, Sciomesa Tams & Bowden and Carelis Bowden. Mixed Bayesian phylogenetic analysis, which included their host plants and two mitochondrial genes, showed the genus Sciomesa to be polyphyletic. Two new genera w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this study, since the taxonomy of the tribe Apameini is still debated, the taxon sampling was constructed according to a wide bibliographic compilation in order to only include genera that are clearly described at this taxonomic level and accepted as taxa of this group [9], [11], [12], [14], [35][38]. Since Zilli and colleagues are presently working on the taxonomy of the group, we chose in a conservative way not to consider the revision of the Apamea species group [10] but instead the latest full revision of the tribe along with other publications in order to avoid any bias in the species-richness inference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this study, since the taxonomy of the tribe Apameini is still debated, the taxon sampling was constructed according to a wide bibliographic compilation in order to only include genera that are clearly described at this taxonomic level and accepted as taxa of this group [9], [11], [12], [14], [35][38]. Since Zilli and colleagues are presently working on the taxonomy of the group, we chose in a conservative way not to consider the revision of the Apamea species group [10] but instead the latest full revision of the tribe along with other publications in order to avoid any bias in the species-richness inference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macro-evolutionary analyses were realized on the genus-level tree created by pruning all non-Apameini genera from the BEAST chronogram. The species richness was assigned to each genus, following the data in the literature [9], [11], [12], [14], [17], [38], using the function getTipdata . Since the taxon sampling is not complete for all Apameini genera, it is difficult to distinguish between crown- and stem-group ages [5], [70].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, our results suggest that most Acrapex species are probably specialist feeders on one or only a few grasses. In general, noctuid stem borers with the most extensive geographic distributions are the most polyphagous (Le Ru et al 2006b;Moyal et al 2010), and none of these widely distributed, polyphagous species belongs to the genus Acrapex. Description Male ( Fig.…”
Section: Host-plant Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were recently displaced to Sciomesa and Feraxinia genera (Moyal et al 2010), thus reducing the total number of Afrotropical Acrapex species to 65. Until 2000, little was known about Acrapex host preferences as specimens had been obtained only from light trap collections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%