1989
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.40.3557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematics of equilibrium charge distributions of ions passing through a carbon foil over the rangesZ=4–92 andE=0.02–6 MeV/u

Abstract: Equilibrium charge distributions have been measured for 18 kinds of ions passing through a carbon foil in the energy region of 1 -6 MeV/u for light ions and of 0.2 -1 MeV/u for heavy ions. By combining the data obtained at present with those reported for other energies or ion species, an attempt is made to find the systematics for charge fraction F(q), mean charge q, and distribution width d over the wide range of ion species Z and energy E. Strong correlation has been found between the shell structure of ions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Resulting average transmitted ion charge states range from 0 for O 71 to 11 for Ar 181 and 1.61 for Th 701 ions. These values agree with measurements and calculations of mean equilibrium charge states of ions at similar velocities [22]. We observed a reduction in average charge states after passage through two stacked 10 nm thick carbon foils from 1.11 to 0.71 for Kr 331 and from 1.61 to 1.11 for Th 651 and attribute this to the continuous slowdown of ions in the foils, and to the decay of any excited states left after transmission of the first foil.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Resulting average transmitted ion charge states range from 0 for O 71 to 11 for Ar 181 and 1.61 for Th 701 ions. These values agree with measurements and calculations of mean equilibrium charge states of ions at similar velocities [22]. We observed a reduction in average charge states after passage through two stacked 10 nm thick carbon foils from 1.11 to 0.71 for Kr 331 and from 1.61 to 1.11 for Th 651 and attribute this to the continuous slowdown of ions in the foils, and to the decay of any excited states left after transmission of the first foil.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The electron traveling with projectile with kinetic energy of 2.7 MeV=nucleon (β ¼ 0.076) has a kinetic energy of 1.5 keV. It is difficult to strip electrons with removal energies higher than 1.5 keV [47,48]. This fact also implies that excited states have little contribution in ionization process in gases [45].…”
Section: A Charge State Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both simulations also succeeded in qualitatively emulating such overshooting behavior of charge-distribution widths for C 2+ , C 3+ , C 4+ , and C 5+ ion injections as well as the monotonous increase of that for C 6+ ion injection in Table 1 Equilibrium charge-state distributions FeqðqÞ for outgoing C q+ ion fractions (q = 3-6), mean charge-states qeq, charge-distribution widths d eq , and skewness s eq for 2.0 MeV/u C-ions through C-foils. Top two lines, nine lines in the middle, and bottom two lines show experimental results, values given by (semi-)empirical formulae [4,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and simulation results, respectively. The equilibrium foil-thickness was estimated to be 10 lg/cm 2 in the present experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following injection into matter, fast heavy ions change their charge states until they establish charge equilibrium, in which increases and decreases in population of each charge-state balance each other, and the population seems to remain unchanged [1]. Representing an important part of atomic collision physics, many papers have been devoted to equilibrium charge fractions, mean charge states, widths, and the skewness of the distribution, which have been compiled in past reviews [2][3][4][5][6]. Also, empirical and semi-empirical formulae to predict the equilibrium mean charge states, distribution widths, and skewness have been presented [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation