2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic lupus erythematosus and infections: Clinical importance of conventional and upcoming biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this, genome-wide association studies have already identified complement receptors and FcγRs as susceptibility genes in autoimmune conditions like SLE. In addition, FcγRI expression has been recently recognized as a new potential biomarker to assist clinical decisionmaking in the management of SLE patients [42,43].…”
Section: Integration Of the Fcγr And Complement Network Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this, genome-wide association studies have already identified complement receptors and FcγRs as susceptibility genes in autoimmune conditions like SLE. In addition, FcγRI expression has been recently recognized as a new potential biomarker to assist clinical decisionmaking in the management of SLE patients [42,43].…”
Section: Integration Of the Fcγr And Complement Network Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their value to predict disease flares and efficacy of therapeutics has been proven; however, even taken together, they are not specific and lack diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between flares and infections [47]. In SLE, unlike in other rheumatic diseases where increase in levels has been observed, changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) level have been less frequently observed during disease flares, proposing this marker as a valid tool to discriminate infection and lupus activity [48].…”
Section: Serological Markers Of Infection In Slementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant data show that the incidence of SLE in China is about 5/10,000: higher than in Japan, or European and American countries (Godarzi et al, 2011;Cui et al, 2013). Concurrently, there is evidence that the pathogenesis of SLE is associated with familial genetics (Shai et al, 1999;Wakeland et al, 2001;Mangale et al, 2013), ultraviolet radiation (McGrath Jr., 1994McGrath et al, 1996), estrogen levels in vivo (Lahita, 1999;Pierdominici and Ortona, 2013;Young et al, 2014), drugs (Fernandes Moça Trevisani et al, 2013;Gurevitz et al, 2013;Hahn, 2013), and food and infections (Sciascia et al, 2012;Touma et al, 2013), etc. However, the pathogenesis of SLE requires further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%