2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02938.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic movement of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in several plant species

Abstract: Aims:  The systemic movement of Agrobacterium spp. inside plants of different species was studied to determine the most valuable diagnostic methodology for their detection. Methods and Results:  Pathogenic agrobacteria were detected by isolation and PCR in tissue away from primary tumours in tomato plants grown in the presence of Agrobacterium spp. Moreover, this bacterium was also able to induce secondary tumours beyond the inoculation site. In addition, the capacity of agrobacteria to translocate and induce … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, systemic infection of these plants was not associated with highest CTV titers in tumours. Moreover, some plants developed secondary tumorigenic tissues with high CTV titer, but systemic infection of these plants never occurred, further supporting our previous suggestion that systemic infection of NB results from CTV invasion of the vascular system and not from Agrobacterium migration within agroinfiltrated plants (Cubero et al, 2006; Ambrós et al, 2011). Contrasting with NB, essentially no CTV coat protein or viral RNA was detected in N. occidentalis tumours in spite of the high GUS expression observed, suggesting limited virus replication if any in cells of this host, in agreement with the lack of CTV replication observed previously in protoplasts of this species (Navas-Castillo et al, 1997; Satyanarayana et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Remarkably, systemic infection of these plants was not associated with highest CTV titers in tumours. Moreover, some plants developed secondary tumorigenic tissues with high CTV titer, but systemic infection of these plants never occurred, further supporting our previous suggestion that systemic infection of NB results from CTV invasion of the vascular system and not from Agrobacterium migration within agroinfiltrated plants (Cubero et al, 2006; Ambrós et al, 2011). Contrasting with NB, essentially no CTV coat protein or viral RNA was detected in N. occidentalis tumours in spite of the high GUS expression observed, suggesting limited virus replication if any in cells of this host, in agreement with the lack of CTV replication observed previously in protoplasts of this species (Navas-Castillo et al, 1997; Satyanarayana et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This key pathway of pathogen movement among cells in a host allows exploitation of uninfected cellular resources and reduces intraspecific competition among pathogens, increasing pathogen population size (e.g., viral titer), which, in turn, increases the likelihood of successful transmission to a new host (56). For example, Agrobacterium sp., the causal agent of crown gall, colonizes xylem vessels, allowing it to move long distances through a plant host and garner resources from cells and tissues distant from the original point of entry (28,39). Similarly, pathogenic fungi such as Ophiostoma spp., including the causal agent of Dutch elm disease, and Fusarium oxysporum, which causes vascular wilt or root rot in more than 100 different host species, colonize xylem vessels and move through the plant via both passive transport and mycelial growth through the xylem (143).…”
Section: Host Cells and Tissues As Patchesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, Agrobacterium sensu lato species also can be harbored within plant tissue (4,5,(8)(9)(10)12,13,(18)(19)(20)31,35,42). The systemic movement of Agrobacterium spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…spp. have been shown to move systemically in several hosts such as chrysanthemum, tomato, sunflower, grape, and cherry (4,5,9,12,19,20,31,35,39,46). A. vitis colonization and movement throughout the vascular system of asyrnptomatic grapevines is perhaps the best understood example.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%