2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic Seismic Vulnerability of Transportation Networks and Emergency Facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This movement (Figure 13) is made up of two rates: d1, which is evaluated considering the bullet motion; and d2, which according to empirical studies [51] is twice d1. Based on these observations, the maximum distance achievable by the MI debris (dmax) is calculated assuming that the maximum velocity of expulsion of the MI at the OOP failure is horizontal (v = v ; v = 0), as shown in (10): Based on these observations, the maximum distance achievable by the MI debris (d max ) is calculated assuming that the maximum velocity of expulsion of the MI at the OOP failure is horizontal (v b = v bx ; v by = 0), as shown in (10):…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Debris Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This movement (Figure 13) is made up of two rates: d1, which is evaluated considering the bullet motion; and d2, which according to empirical studies [51] is twice d1. Based on these observations, the maximum distance achievable by the MI debris (dmax) is calculated assuming that the maximum velocity of expulsion of the MI at the OOP failure is horizontal (v = v ; v = 0), as shown in (10): Based on these observations, the maximum distance achievable by the MI debris (d max ) is calculated assuming that the maximum velocity of expulsion of the MI at the OOP failure is horizontal (v b = v bx ; v by = 0), as shown in (10):…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Debris Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method considers the uncertainties associated with earthquake distributions in time and space, the ground motion distribution, and the damage caused to buildings and road structures. Tamima and Chouinard [10] developed a probabilistic approach to estimate reductions in road capacity because of debris generated by collapsed buildings, as well as to evaluate the reductions in response times of the first responders. Xu et al [6] proposed a method to evaluate the post-earthquake traversability of a road network considering collapsed masonry and reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, which was determined using a multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main influencing factors of the vulnerability evaluation are first identified, a mathematical function model is then established, and the vulnerability of the object is evaluated (Arboleda et al 2007(Arboleda et al , 2009. Tamima and Chouinard (2017) considered the impact of structural damage on personnel evacuation and emergency rescue and established a probabilistic model that could simulate the process of roadside debris generation. They then used the model to simulate the response time and the changes in the spatial distribution of emergency facilities to illustrate their impact on the vulnerability of the hospital system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the event of an earthquake, several studies have already examined the consequences of road network closures as presented in Tamima and Chouinard (2017). However, few studies have focused on bridge and road closures in the event of hurricanes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%