Water Stress 2012
DOI: 10.5772/31306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic Signaling Under Water Deficit Condition and Its Exploitation in Water Saving Agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of the subsidy to the water user is not clear, and the government has no clear regulations on the amount of the subsidy or how to issue the subsidy [1]. Although the hidden subsidy model shares the water cost of farmers, the low water price also leads to a lack of inherent motivation for farmers to use water-saving technologies [4]. In the study area of this article, 63.06% of the farmers believe that the water price they pay is higher than the cost of water supply, while 18.79% of the farmers believe that the water fee they pay is equal to the water supply cost, 17.2% of the farmers believe that the water price they pay is lower than the water supply cost, and only 0.96% of farmers think it is much lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of the subsidy to the water user is not clear, and the government has no clear regulations on the amount of the subsidy or how to issue the subsidy [1]. Although the hidden subsidy model shares the water cost of farmers, the low water price also leads to a lack of inherent motivation for farmers to use water-saving technologies [4]. In the study area of this article, 63.06% of the farmers believe that the water price they pay is higher than the cost of water supply, while 18.79% of the farmers believe that the water fee they pay is equal to the water supply cost, 17.2% of the farmers believe that the water price they pay is lower than the water supply cost, and only 0.96% of farmers think it is much lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%