2011
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems biology of stem cells: three useful perspectives to help overcome the paradigm of linear pathways

Abstract: Stem cell behaviours, such as stabilization of the undecided state of pluripotency or multipotency, the priming towards a prospective fate, binary fate decisions and irreversible commitment, must all somehow emerge from a genome-wide gene-regulatory network. Its unfathomable complexity defies the standard mode of explanation that is deeply rooted in molecular biology thinking: the reduction of observables to linear deterministic molecular pathways that are tacitly taken as chains of causation. Such culture of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
75
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(120 reference statements)
4
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attractor states display robustness against stochastic fluctuations, such that a clonal population of cells appears as a bounded "cloud" of cells when the gene expression pattern of each cell is displayed as a point in a high-dimensional gene expression space (7). This robustness is the reason why cells can collectively be identified as a distinct phenotype, representing what we know as "cell type," despite the substantial cell-cell variability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attractor states display robustness against stochastic fluctuations, such that a clonal population of cells appears as a bounded "cloud" of cells when the gene expression pattern of each cell is displayed as a point in a high-dimensional gene expression space (7). This robustness is the reason why cells can collectively be identified as a distinct phenotype, representing what we know as "cell type," despite the substantial cell-cell variability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this theoretical framework, the distinct cell states or substates, such as multipotent states or terminal cell types in normal tissues or the stem-like (tumor-initiating) or metastatic state in cancer, are all attractor states: they are distinct "self-stabilizing" configurations of gene activities across the genome that arise because of constraints in the collective gene expression imposed by gene-gene regulatory interactions of the GRN (1,7). Attractor states display robustness against stochastic fluctuations, such that a clonal population of cells appears as a bounded "cloud" of cells when the gene expression pattern of each cell is displayed as a point in a high-dimensional gene expression space (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many possible combinations of individual gene expression states appear combinatorially possible, only a subset of these exists in reality. Furthermore, cells expressing similar levels of pluripotency genes may have reached that position from different starting points and be on different trajectories [79].…”
Section: Mechanisms That Underpin Pluripotencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the hypothesis that heterogeneity allows differentiation to proceed while retaining a pluripotent population [64]. This idea is pursued in relation to the transition of ES cells to EpiSCs by Osorno & Chambers. In this issue, Huang [79] discusses such heterogeneity using mathematical representations of cell identities in terms of the quantitative state of gene expression in a cell at a given time. While many possible combinations of individual gene expression states appear combinatorially possible, only a subset of these exists in reality.…”
Section: Mechanisms That Underpin Pluripotencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these linked conditions increase the risk to develop metabolic syndrome and type-2 diabetes mellitus. To understand how such complex syndrome emerges, it is necessary to use an integrative, system-level and dynamic approach that takes into consideration: the non-linearity of the interactions, the strong effect of the environment, the constant crosstalk and feed forward or feed-back interactions among the genetic and nongenetic components involved, and the synchronic or concerted nature of various regulatory events and conditions involved [5][6][7][8][9]. Most studies have focused on the direct relationship between macrophages and obesity [10], meanwhile, important questions concerning the relationship between obesity, insulin, and CD4+ T cell type populations and plastic changes among them remain unaddressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%