2020
DOI: 10.1111/josl.12414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems, features, figures: Approaches to language and class vs. language and race

Abstract: This paper contrasts different approaches taken in research on language and race vs. language and class. It looks at the timescales, units of analysis, and phenomena that have drawn scholars’ attention, and considers how each subfield approaches the study of language and inequality. 본고는 언어와 인종주의 연구, 언어와 사회계층 연구의 두 분야에서 쓰이는 다양한 이론적 접근들을 비교·분석 한다. 본고는 기존연구들에서 쓰여진 시공간적 접근방법, 연구분석 단위와 분석방법 및 연구 현상을 면밀하게 검토하며 이러한 이론적 접근들을 언어와 사회 불평등 연구분야에 어떻게 적용시킬 수 있는지 알아본다.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Banda also warns against the dangers of representing the lower classes as “perpetually condemned” (p. 14), suggesting that one of the best ways to understand the structural conditions of inequality is to analyze how “social class signals,” such as elite uses of English, are contested by the groups they marginalize. Finally, Christian W. Chun (2019), whose work is closely allied with Lo’s (2020) contribution discussed above, calls for more attention to changing structures, focusing on how the contours of class shift across contextualized interaction. Chun is specifically interested in the “interanimation” of class with other social processes that may not readily be seen as related to capitalist subjectivity, such as race.…”
Section: Class In Language Gender and Sexuality Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Banda also warns against the dangers of representing the lower classes as “perpetually condemned” (p. 14), suggesting that one of the best ways to understand the structural conditions of inequality is to analyze how “social class signals,” such as elite uses of English, are contested by the groups they marginalize. Finally, Christian W. Chun (2019), whose work is closely allied with Lo’s (2020) contribution discussed above, calls for more attention to changing structures, focusing on how the contours of class shift across contextualized interaction. Chun is specifically interested in the “interanimation” of class with other social processes that may not readily be seen as related to capitalist subjectivity, such as race.…”
Section: Class In Language Gender and Sexuality Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that multifaceted aspects of participant identities, which our methods are unable to fully capture, also influence their linguistic experiences, especially with respect to region and class. As Lo (2020) discusses, conceptualizations of ‘language and race’ without a broader contextualization of other factors, sometimes fail to present the entire sociolinguistic picture, which represents a limitation for the field. However, as the current study is among the first to specifically address racialized linguistic experiences on campus, we hope it acts as a starting point for further research that explores these complex intersections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the country's richness in natural resources, significant economic growth and rapid expansion of access to primary education, the capital city of Mozambique, Maputo, faces a paradox shared by capital cities in former colonies: regardless of high economic growth, Maputo city continues to be marked by spatial divisions and social and economic inequalities. Aiming to engage with recent debates about how to study the relationship of language to dimensions of social inequality (Gal & Irvine, 2019; Lo, 2020) and particularly to the divisive dynamics of languages in former colonies (Tupas, 2019) and in African contexts (Banda, 2020), this study proposes empirically grounded analyses based on various forms of data, inspired by Bourdieu's work, as a promising way forward to explore the often multidimensional and mutually reinforcing foundations for social hierarchies and the crafting of ‘distinctive’ selves in postcolonial and African contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary inequalities are therefore closely tied to what Bourdieu described as ‘classification struggles’, or the battle over the templates for thinking, feeling and making judgements of social practices. These templates also shape our lifestyle choices which are central to the crafting of selves through ‘emblems of distinction’ (Bourdieu, 1984; Bourdieu & Wacquant, 1992; Gal & Irvine, 2019; Lo, 2020, p. 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%