IntroductionTargeted mAb-based therapies provide effective and safe treatments for hematologic malignancies. Rituximab, which specifically targets the B-cell antigen CD20, has had the greatest success, revolutionizing the treatment of the 2 most common forms of nonHodgkin lymphoma: follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In addition, mAb-based therapies targeting CD52 (alemtuzumab) and CD33 (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) have been approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute myelogenous leukemia, respectively. Despite the progress of these strategies, they do have limitations. Only a fraction of patients respond to rituximab, and the majority of those who do respond will eventually relapse. Treatment with alemtuzumab and gemtuzumab are limited by safety concerns, and many additional hematologic malignancies do not respond to treatment with any of these targeted therapies. Various therapies based on alternate mAbs, including second-generation anti-CD20 mAbs and those targeting alternate cell-surface proteins such as CD19, CD22, CD30, CD37, CD40, and CD74, have been developed and are at different stages of clinical testing in the hopes of providing approaches to treating a broader spectrum of hematologic malignancies that are poorly served by existing therapies. 1,2 Whereas targeting of cell-surface antigens themselves can mediate antitumor activity through the induction of apoptosis, most mAb-based activity against hematologic malignancies is reliant on either Fc-mediated effector functions such as complementdependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity 3,4 or is engineered through the conjugation of an immunotoxin or radiolabeled isotope. 1 Considering the potential of naturally occurring CTLs to mediate cell lysis, various strategies have also been explored to recruit CTLs to mediate tumor cell killing. Tumor-specific CTLs exert extremely potent effects through recognition of the corresponding peptide/MHC complex recognized by their TCR, and are among the most potent cells that mediate antitumor effects. A major limitation in generating tumorspecific CTLs in vivo is that their induction requires the use of vaccine strategies, such as dendritic cell-based vaccines, 5 that are capable of breaking tolerance to cancer self-antigens. One alternative is ex vivo expansion and activation of rare, tumor-specific CTLs for reinfusion into cancer patients. 6 However, cancer cells can down-regulate MHC expression as an escape mechanism, thus preventing the ability of CTLs to recognize their antigenic peptide. The genetic manipulation of patients' T cells to express chimeric antigen receptors comprising a tumor-specific antigen and T cellactivating properties before their adoptive transfer provides a non-MHC-restricted approach to targeting cancer, as was shown recently in the treatment of lymphoma with T cells engineered to recognize CD19. 7 However, the patient-specific manipulation and risk associated with this procedure represent major limitations to its expanded use. Alt...