1985
DOI: 10.1177/0013164485454004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tables of Effect Size for Z Score Tests of Differences between Proportions and between Correlation Coefficients

Abstract: Tables are given for the rapid estimation of h, the effect size index for the difference between independent proportions, and of q, the effect size index for the difference between independent correlation coefficients. The tables are accurate to three decimal places and may be used conveniently in conjunction with tables and charts of power and sample size. Formulas for power and sample size estimation are also presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous research showing a linear relationship between baseline stage and consistent condom use one year later (Evers et al, 1998), we assumed a monotonically increasing linear pattern of outcomes across stages. A linear test of trend on the arcsine corrected proportions (Rossi, 1985), corrected for unequal sample sizes, provided some support for this assumption ( p =.074).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on previous research showing a linear relationship between baseline stage and consistent condom use one year later (Evers et al, 1998), we assumed a monotonically increasing linear pattern of outcomes across stages. A linear test of trend on the arcsine corrected proportions (Rossi, 1985), corrected for unequal sample sizes, provided some support for this assumption ( p =.074).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There was a significant difference in the control group for age, with the Maintainers having significantly more adults over the age of 50 years (31.26%) than either Relapsers (21.65%, h =0.219) or the Stable Smokers (23.87%, h = 0.166). The effect size indicator Cohen’s h represents the standardized difference between proportions (Cohen, 1988; Rossi, 1985). Its interpretation is exactly analogous to that of Cohen’s d ( h = 0.20 = small effect size; h = 0.50 = medium effect size; h = 0.80 = large effect size).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohen’s d , calculated using a weighted pooled SD of both groups, 22,23 was used to calculate the effect size for mean differences, whereas Cohen’s h (based on the arcsine transformation of proportions 22,24 ) was used for differences between proportions. Although multiple methods for determining standardized effect sizes exist, Cohen’s d is the standard method for examining mean differences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%