2015
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/12514.6217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taboos Related to Dog Bite in an Urban Area of Kancheepuram District of Tamil Nadu, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Tab-2). The lack of knowledge regarding misconception of food restriction followed after animal bite was quite similar to previous other studies 2,12 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(Tab-2). The lack of knowledge regarding misconception of food restriction followed after animal bite was quite similar to previous other studies 2,12 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The sample size was estimated based on the prevalence of taboos (p=42%) related to dog bite found in a study done by Chinnaian S, et al 2 Based on this the sample size was estimated using the formula sample size n= z 2 pq/L 2 , where p was 42%, q was (1-p), and L was relative precision. The estimated sample size was 259, and considering a 10% non-response, the sample size was 259.…”
Section: Sample Size and Sample Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are comparable with the study conducted by Seenivasan et al in which 18.3% were illiterate and Chinnaian et al reported 14.9% illiterates. 15,16 Majority (48.80%) belonged to lower middle class, 28.60% were in middle class followed by 14% were in upper middle class, 6% in lower class and 2.70% in upper class. This distribution of socio-economic status is comparable with previous studies by Anandaraj et al in Karnataka where 33.3%were in lower middle class, 31.3% were in middle class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%