Tackling Carbon Intensity With Green Finance in the Covid-19-Era: Recommendations for Oecd Economies

Lu, Lijing; Zheng, Haiyang; Chen, Meilan; Najam, Hina

doi:10.1142/s2010007822400140

Cited by 19 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results are shown in Table 4. Columns (1) and (2) show that both factor mismatch and the structural mismatch of financial resources have a significant inhibitory effect on the improvement of GDE. In terms of specific values, the inhibitory effect of the structural mismatch of financial resources on GDE is significantly larger than that of the factor mismatch of financial resources.…”

Section: Disaggregated Regression Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To address these challenges, the United Nations has set 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including climate action and renewable energy. Many countries have begun to promote the development of a green economy to adapt to global climate change and increasing ecological dangers [2]. China is the world's second-largest economy and has been growing consistently and steadily for more than 40 years since its opening and reform.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does Financial Resource Misallocation Inhibit the Improvement of Green Development Efficiency? Evidence from China

Han

Wang

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Improving the efficiency of green development is an important means of achieving high-quality development, and the optimal allocation of financial resources is the core factor in promoting green development. Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China taken from 2005 to 2021, this paper constructs a financial resource misallocation (FM) index and green development efficiency (GDE) measurement system, empirically examining the impact and transmission path of FM on the GDE from the dual perspectives of financial resource element mismatch and structural mismatch. First, the results show that financial misallocation is the key factor inhibiting the improvement of GDE, and with the improvement of GDE, the inhibitory effect of financial misallocation decreases first and then increases in an inverted V-shaped trend. Second, the inhibitory effect of financial resource structure mismatch on GDE is greater than that of financial resource element mismatch. Moreover, after the degree of financial marketization is distinguished, this inhibitory effect is more evident in the regions with a low degree of financial marketization. Third, through mechanism analysis, we found that FM affects the improvement of GDE by inhibiting financial resource agglomeration through enterprise technological innovation and industrial structure height.

show abstract

Section: Disaggregated Regression Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Financial Resource Misallocation Inhibit the Improvement of Green Development Efficiency? Evidence from China

Han

Wang

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It means, all have a positive connection with the financial growth of China. A region's economic development level is typically higher when that region's economy is more developed (Lu et al, 2022; Xie et al, 2022). There was a positive association between the level of economic development and landscape ecology.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does landscape ecology matter to a country's financial development? Evidence from China

Feng

Fu²

2023

Geological Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Landscape ecology is vital and significantly contributes to the country's social and economic growth. This concept is directly linked with sustainable development goals, and a growing potential exists that landscape ecology will replace conventional landscaping practices as the authoritative framework for environmentally responsible landscaping. Decentralizing spatial planning policy requires local actors to work together to determine what physical changes must be made to the environment to reflect their respective values. To be applicable in such bottom‐up landscape‐development processes, this study checks the relationship between the landscape ecological perspective and the financial development of China over the period 1995–2021 by using the autoregressive distributed lag model. The findings indicated that green investment, environmental pressure and energy consumption play a significant role in China's financial development. Landscape ecological research should pay more attention to these dilemmas as a unifying common ground to produce a joint knowledge base that can be incorporated into multifunctional, actor‐led landscape development. This research adds value to the modern pattern‐process model in landscape ecology by developing this idea into a knowledgeable framework. Subsequently, this study promotes green investment activities and consumption of energy sources so that landscape ecology aims should be obtained through interdisciplinary research. Future research can be done by taking the emerging economies into account.

show abstract

“…The economies of many Asian countries are expanding at unprecedented rates. As a result of climate change, it appears that Asia's rapidly developing economies will have to enhance their clean and green energy capacity if they continue down their current path away from fossil fuels (Lu et al, 2022; Z. Xie et al, 2022). Most Asian nations are beginning to see the value in diversifying their energy sources to include more renewable sources.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do green finance, low‐carbon energy transition, and economic growth help in environmental investment?: Empirical evidence from emerging economies in Asia

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Environmentally friendly initiatives and green financing are needed to reduce pollution and transition to a low‐carbon energy system. This research was conducted to assess the efficacy of green bond financing for scaling up environmentally responsible investment in preparation for the low‐carbon energy transition in emerging Asian economies. The generalized method of moment's methodology is used to examine the impact of green finance, CO2 emission, and economic growth on the environmental investment of emerging nations over the period 2000–2021. The result showed that all these factors contribute significantly to environmental investment. In addition, the results showed that the burdens of global warming are achievable to alleviate through green bonds for the optimum transition to low‐carbon energy. Moreover, these economies have enacted measures to assist them in becoming green and encourage green initiatives, which function harmoniously with each other and have decreased carbon emissions, leading to the possible adaptation of green environmental investment sources. Hence, it is recommended that these economies boost their green financing activities, low‐carbon emissions, and economic development so that eco‐innovation and ecological investment can be made properly.

show abstract

Tackling Carbon Intensity With Green Finance in the Covid-19-Era: Recommendations for Oecd Economies

Cited by 19 publications

References 68 publications

Does Financial Resource Misallocation Inhibit the Improvement of Green Development Efficiency? Evidence from China

Does Financial Resource Misallocation Inhibit the Improvement of Green Development Efficiency? Evidence from China

Does landscape ecology matter to a country's financial development? Evidence from China

Do green finance, low‐carbon energy transition, and economic growth help in environmental investment?: Empirical evidence from emerging economies in Asia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About