2018
DOI: 10.1177/0047287517751676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling the Complexity of the Pro-environmental Behavior Intentions of Visitors to Turtle Sites

Abstract: This empirical study improved our understanding of how to simulate visitors’ pro-environmental behavior intentions (PEBIs) during interpretive marine turtle tours in Cyprus. Complexity theory was applied as a sufficient theoretical basis of the proposed configurational model that was tested using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) as an innovative set theoretic approach. Four configurations—demographics, values, beliefs, and norms and attitudes—were used to explore causal recipes leading to bot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
106
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(174 reference statements)
10
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) assessment of the measurement model; and (2) testing of the structural model (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988;Hair, Black, Babin, Anderson, & Tatham, 2010;Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2013). While PLS-SEM as a symmetrical analysis assesses sufficient net effects of predictors on model outcome, fsQCA, which is an asymmetrical analytical approach, calculates causal configurations that explain the complex conditions for achieving model outcome (Olya & Akhshik, 2018).…”
Section: Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) assessment of the measurement model; and (2) testing of the structural model (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988;Hair, Black, Babin, Anderson, & Tatham, 2010;Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2013). While PLS-SEM as a symmetrical analysis assesses sufficient net effects of predictors on model outcome, fsQCA, which is an asymmetrical analytical approach, calculates causal configurations that explain the complex conditions for achieving model outcome (Olya & Akhshik, 2018).…”
Section: Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of fsQCA offer a guideline for managers to know how to combine predictors (e.g. CSR and transformational leadership) in order to predict the conditions leading to high and low scores of performance (Olya & Akhshik, 2018;Olya & Al-ansi, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TPB is commonly used to elucidate customers' behavioural intentions in the green consumption context, which is a complex social phenomenon. This complexity is caused by the non-linear, fuzzy, and dynamic processes of human decision-making and the complication of behaviours toward environmental issues (Lezak & Thibodeau, 2016;Olya & Akhshik, 2018). According to Lucas et al (2008, p. 458), "Socio-psychological models of individual behavior reveal environment-related behaviors to be complex and non-linear, shaped by multiple antecedent factors applying in different sequences and with different weighting to determine the end behavior.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10.1108/IJCHM-05-2018-0374. Against this backdrop, recent studies have called for the application of a pragmatic approach for advancing theories and methods to enlighten the black-box process of tourists' pro-environmental behaviours (Juvan & Dolnicar, 2017;Kiatkawsin & Han 2017;Olya & Akhshik, 2018). As an alternative solution for the extension, decomposition, and merging of the TPB, this empirical study proposes a configurational model, along with a structural model, to explore the configuration of three TPB elements in formulating the behavioural intentions of green hotel guests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total score of this construct is then computed in order to interpret the raw scores in a more manageable way. Subsequently, the summated scores are further segregated into three categories, namely Low (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), Moderate (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44), and High (45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60). To conclude, the higher the score, the higher the injunctive norm towards intention to practise solid waste segregation-at-source.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%