1978
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.1978.4309886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactile Information Processing by Human Operators in Control Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For aggregate data, our estimate RT 0 ϭ 218 ms is close to the values reported elsewhere (Schmid & Bekey, 1978;Smeets & Brenner;Flanders).…”
Section: Reaction Timesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For aggregate data, our estimate RT 0 ϭ 218 ms is close to the values reported elsewhere (Schmid & Bekey, 1978;Smeets & Brenner;Flanders).…”
Section: Reaction Timesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As stated in prior literature (see, e.g., Schmid & Bekey, 1978;Flanders, 2009), processing reaction time is critical in haptic perception. We acknowledge that the reaction time we have measured cannot be entirely attributed to the human ability to detect a virtual surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Information about the human operator's performance when controlling a robot or simulated "vehicle" is usually presented visually (McRuer 1980), although tactile (Hill 1970;Schmid and Bekey 1978), auditory (Mirchandani 1972;Takashima et al 1980) and kinaesthetic (Jagacinski et al 1979(Jagacinski et al , 1983) displays have also been used to convey error information to the operator. Visual and tactile error signals result in similar performance if the signal fed back to the operator consists of the error (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…difference between the input signal and controlled output)plus information about its rate of change (Hill 1970). However, the error variance is considerably lower with visual displays if the error signal alone is fed back, and longer time delays are associated with tactile displays (Hill 1970;Jagacinski et al 1983;Schmid and Bekey 1978). The more successful non-visual tracking systems have used compensatory displays in which only the difference, or error, between the reference input and system output is presented to the operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work showed that the tactile sense could provide at least as much orientation information as sight although the reaction to that information was slightly slower, being in the order of 200 ms as opposed to 75 ms (Van Erp and Van Den Dobbelsteen, 1998). This translated in a previous beltarea tactile display used in a tracking task (Schmid and Bekey, 1978) to a response time of 0.25 sec versus 0.10 seconds for a visual response. This slight delay is thought to be due to the conduction velocity of the nerves concerned and is of no practical significance in the application proposed in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%