2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs14010111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TAE-Net: Task-Adaptive Embedding Network for Few-Shot Remote Sensing Scene Classification

Abstract: Recently, approaches based on deep learning are quite prevalent in the area of remote sensing scene classification. Though significant success has been achieved, these approaches are still subject to an excess of parameters and extremely dependent on a large quantity of labeled data. In this study, few-shot learning is used for remote sensing scene classification tasks. The goal of few-shot learning is to recognize unseen scene categories given extremely limited labeled samples. For this purpose, a novel task-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the combination of information from other samples in the dataset and the use of transductive inference contribute to its performance. [26] 85.41 ± 0.35 92.28 ± 0.13 baseline [33] 75.57 ± 0.36 88.65 ± 0.18 S2M2 [55] 69.00 ± 0.41 82.14 ± 0.21 Meta-SGD [56] 51.54 ± 2.31 61.74 ± 2.02 MatchingNet [57] 76.14 ± 0.35 84.00 ± 0.20 ProtoNet [58] 77.00 ± 0.36 91.70 ± 0.15 RelationNet [59] 77.76 ± 0.34 86.84 ± 0.15 DLA-MatchNet [35] 70.21 ± 0.32 81.86 ± 0.52 IDLN [36] 73.89 ± 0.88 83.12 ± 0.56 TAE-Net [37] 73.67 ± 0.74 88.95 ± 0.52 CAN+T [60] 69.79 ± 0.56 79.71 ± 0.22 SPNet [25] 81.06 ± 0.60 88.04 ± 0.28 DANet [28] 75.02 ± 0.16 89.21 ± 0.07 CS 2 TFSL (Ours) 86.03 ± 0.13 93.09 ± 0.05…”
Section: Results On the Whu-rs19 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the combination of information from other samples in the dataset and the use of transductive inference contribute to its performance. [26] 85.41 ± 0.35 92.28 ± 0.13 baseline [33] 75.57 ± 0.36 88.65 ± 0.18 S2M2 [55] 69.00 ± 0.41 82.14 ± 0.21 Meta-SGD [56] 51.54 ± 2.31 61.74 ± 2.02 MatchingNet [57] 76.14 ± 0.35 84.00 ± 0.20 ProtoNet [58] 77.00 ± 0.36 91.70 ± 0.15 RelationNet [59] 77.76 ± 0.34 86.84 ± 0.15 DLA-MatchNet [35] 70.21 ± 0.32 81.86 ± 0.52 IDLN [36] 73.89 ± 0.88 83.12 ± 0.56 TAE-Net [37] 73.67 ± 0.74 88.95 ± 0.52 CAN+T [60] 69.79 ± 0.56 79.71 ± 0.22 SPNet [25] 81.06 ± 0.60 88.04 ± 0.28 DANet [28] 75.02 ± 0.16 89.21 ± 0.07 CS 2 TFSL (Ours) 86.03 ± 0.13 93.09 ± 0.05…”
Section: Results On the Whu-rs19 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of two main components: an embedding network and an iterative distribution learning strategy. Huang et al [37] proposed a task-adaptive attention component, which combined the meta-learning training mechanism and graph neural network transductive inference in few-shot scene classification.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Few-shot Remote Sensing Scene Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental results on the Single Datasets are listed in Table 2. The proposed method is compared with RDPN [17], TAE-Net [18], SAFFNet, DLA MatchNet, SCL-MLNet [19], L2-Norm ProtoNet, and RelationNet [20]. It can be seen from Table 2 that the accuracy of our method on the three RS scene datasets is significantly higher than all other methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang and others [ 15 ] presented a task-adoptive embedding network for facilitating few-shot scene classification of RSI, represented as TAE-Net. First, a feature encoder was trained on the base set for learning embedded features of input image in the pretraining stage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%