Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1526709.1526925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tag-oriented document summarization

Abstract: Social annotations on a Web document are highly generalized description of topics contained in that page. Their tagged frequency indicates the user attentions with various degrees. This makes annotations a good resource for summarizing multiple topics in a Web page. In this paper, we present a tag-oriented Web document summarization approach by using both document content and the tags annotated on that document. To improve summarization performance, a new tag ranking algorithm named EigenTag is proposed in thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sentencebased summarization focuses on partitioning documents in sentences and generating a summary that consists of the subset of most informative sentences (e.g., [11,29,47]). In contrast, keyword-based approaches focus on detecting salient document keywords using, for instance, graph-based indexing [28,51,52] or latent semantic analysis [16]. Since sentence-based approaches commonly generate humanly readable summaries without the need for advanced postprocessing steps, our summarizer relies on a sentencebased approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sentencebased summarization focuses on partitioning documents in sentences and generating a summary that consists of the subset of most informative sentences (e.g., [11,29,47]). In contrast, keyword-based approaches focus on detecting salient document keywords using, for instance, graph-based indexing [28,51,52] or latent semantic analysis [16]. Since sentence-based approaches commonly generate humanly readable summaries without the need for advanced postprocessing steps, our summarizer relies on a sentencebased approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, clustering-based approaches (e.g., [47,48]) adopt clustering algorithms to group document sentences into homogeneous clusters and then select the most authoritative representatives within each group. In contrast, graph-based approaches (e.g., [36,51,52]) first generate a graph-based model in which the similarity relationships between pairs of sentences are represented. Next, they exploit popular indexing strategies (e.g., PageRank [9]) to identify the most salient sentences (i.e., the most authoritative graph nodes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al [2008] also used user comments to assist summarization and they experimented with various methods for weighting the comments and creating the summary. Zhu et al [2009] used information from user tags to assist summarization, and to that purpose they developed a HITS-type of ranking method. Finally, Boydell and Smyth [2010] use tag information from delicious to assist to the extraction of snippets from Web documents.…”
Section: Web Page Summarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our problem of finding discriminative items between two streams can provide solutions to many Web mining applications such as tag suggestions [22,28,42,53] summarizing web documents [40,59], emails [10], or Web search results [32], search engine query analysis [56], social network analysis [49,54], and so on. An essential issue inherent in those applications is to find discriminative tags or keywords that can distinguish the targeting object from many others.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%