2011
DOI: 10.1039/c0jm03399e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring drug release profile of low-molecular-weight hydrogels by supramolecular co-assembly and thiol–ene orthogonal coupling

Abstract: We describe a general user-friendly platform for fine-tuning the drug release properties of low-molecular-weight hydrogels by a combination of supramolecular co-assembly of complementary molecular structures and controlled photochemical thiol-ene cross-linking.Other critical features such as thermomechanical stability and morphology of the nanostructured hydrogels are also tailored by this approach.Molecular functional gels able to immobilize a large number of solvent molecules have been a subject of study for… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For release study, 5 mL of PBS was placed on top of the gels and 1.0 mL of samples were withdrawn from the release medium at different time intervals (2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr, 16 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr, 96 hr and 120 hr) and replaced with fresh PBS. Contents of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs into the overlying PBS was monitored by methods reported earlier 13 52 53 54 55 56 using UV-vis spectroscopy. The percentage release was calculated using an equation: Percentage Release = (Absorbance of drug released in PBS/Absorbance of total drug encapsulated in gel) X 100.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For release study, 5 mL of PBS was placed on top of the gels and 1.0 mL of samples were withdrawn from the release medium at different time intervals (2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr, 16 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr, 96 hr and 120 hr) and replaced with fresh PBS. Contents of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs into the overlying PBS was monitored by methods reported earlier 13 52 53 54 55 56 using UV-vis spectroscopy. The percentage release was calculated using an equation: Percentage Release = (Absorbance of drug released in PBS/Absorbance of total drug encapsulated in gel) X 100.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative diffusion coefficient (D) of drugs in the gel matrix was calculated by using the non-steady state diffusion model equation given as: M t /M ∞ = 4 X (D t /π λ 2 ) 1/2 , where, M t is the total amount of drug released at the time of measurement, M ∞ is the total amount of drug that was kept in the matrix, λ represents the hydrogel thickness, t is the time of measurement, and D is the diffusion coefficient of the drug 55 . The ClogP values of the drugs were obtained from “drug bank” and “pubchem”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Other reports have controlled gelation using (e.g.) pH, 18 photoirradiation, 19 or crosslinking reactions 20 to trigger or inhibit drug release. Recently, we have worked with gelators based on the 1,3:2,4-dibenzylidene sorbitol (DBS) framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations above this valuewere not evaluated in this work. In a previous report, we demonstrated the use of a supramolecular co-assembly strategy for fine-tuning the properties of hydrogels for drug delivery applications 51. With this in mind, we checked that stable gels could also be made of mixtures click-TIA:5-TIA at different molar ratios being click-TIA always the major component (see below).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%