Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - 1993
DOI: 10.3115/981574.981605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring lexical choice to the user's vocabulary in multimedia explanation generation

Abstract: In this paper, we discuss the different strategies used in COMET (COordinated Multimedia Explanation Testbed) for selecting words with which the user is familiar. When pictures cannot be used to disambiguate a word or phrase, COMET has four strategies for avoiding unknown words. We give examples for each of these strategies and show how they are implemented in COMET.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This topic has been addressed in a number of previous research projects, where reader expertise has been used to inform decisions about lexical choice and terminology [80] and document structure [91]. In a similar vein, Williams [127] varied a number of linguistic parameters based on literacy level.…”
Section: Bt-family: Informing Stressed Parents About the Status Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic has been addressed in a number of previous research projects, where reader expertise has been used to inform decisions about lexical choice and terminology [80] and document structure [91]. In a similar vein, Williams [127] varied a number of linguistic parameters based on literacy level.…”
Section: Bt-family: Informing Stressed Parents About the Status Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COMET system [McKeown et al 1993] tailors word choice to the vocabulary that the user is presumed to command and employs four strategies to rephrase a message in cases where the user model indicates that some word will not be understood: choose a synonym provided by the lexicon; rephrase with a conceptual definition, e.g., give a lower-level description of a term; rephrase a referring expression (the COMSEC cable) with a descriptive phrase (the cable that runs to the KY57); use past discourse to construct a new referring expression (the cable you just removed). The user model relates the lexicon entries to annotations that indicate whether a stereotypical 'good' or 'poor' reader will be familiar with the term and thus establishes additional constraints for the lexical chooser module that is in charge of selecting the words.…”
Section: Pragmatic Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to tailoring texts for different readers, a number of previous NLG systems tailor texts according to whether the reader is a domain expert or a novice, (Paris, 1988; Bateman and Paris, 1989; McKeown, Robin and Tanenblatt, 1993; Milosavljevic and Oberlander, 1998). Other systems tailor content according to users' likes and dislikes, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%